I don’t disagree with anything you say there. So. Miss can become that. History says its pretty dang lopsided. Both teams have to win regularly for a rivalry to develop.
Going by your definition, historically speaking, our only real rivalry is McNeese.
A state wasn’t forced heated battles on the football field is what created that hate.
Sooooo, a budget hire. If paying 1 mil first year would be the non budget hire, then paying the "belt average" would be budget. If Des isn't the local guy, named John Smith from Lansing Michigan, and we hired him with zero head coaching experience for the same money as a coach with a ton of head coaching experience, who got more for their money if they're getting paid the same? I'm way less concerned with the amount paid than I am that now was not the time to try your hand at the local guy with zero head coaching experience. You literally just came off the most successful run in school history!!! Putting the future into an unknown isn't the smartest decision. But no one can say that around here, or you "hate Des" or a "negative fan" or "not a real fan". Critical thinking is like a pile of stinking $#!+ around here. Take everything personal.
I do not disagree with one word you are saying. It is very fair to question the resume that was hired. I am not disputing that at all. But to say it was a hire because we wanted to save money isn’t true.
Hypothetical here. Lets say we hired Clay Helton who is now at Ga. So. for the same amount we are paying Des, would people be saying it was a budget hire? They make roughly the same now.
You're just arguing with the wrong person. He's some sort of Des sycophant and he's going to die on that hill and even claim we couldn't pay Napier even one more year of his contract because we had no money. It's the same thing he's posted for the majority of 20,000 something posts.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)