Coach Desormeaux

[Louisiana84]

Mike is one of our own. So was Dr. Authement.

[Clutch0364]

. As to would anyone else have hired Mike, you are damn straight they would. Tim Rebowe had no experience as a college coordinator and was only a position coach before taking the job at Nichols.

He may have been able to get an FCS job like Rebowe but there is zero possibility that Des would have been hired at another FBS program. Rebowe as well would not have been hired at an FBS program.

[cajuns80]

Who was knocking on Billy's door before we came calling? No one, that's who. He was the offensive coordinator at Arizona, who had just fired its head coach and hired Herman Edwards. As to would anyone else have hired Mike, you are damn straight they would. Tim Rebowe had no experience as a college coordinator and was only a position coach before taking the job at Nichols.

Mike is one of our own, and it is time for some of you to get over it. Two threads and countless blah, blah, blah, and buts.

This ain't Nicholls. This is a division 1 job.

[MelRock]

Mike is one of our own. So was Dr. Authement.

Got it, anyone who has been our coach for a season and two games is Dr. Authement. Thanks!

[MelRock]

This ain't Nicholls. This is a division 1 job.

Nicholls is a Division 1 job as well, but thanks!

[Louisiana84]

Got it, anyone who has been our coach for a season and two games is Dr. Authement. Thanks!

Nope. I'll be pleasantly surprised if Mike is successful here because I don't think he has the experience necessary for the job. We could have hired better, and we should have. That's my point.

When I think about past administrators at Louisiana, I think one of the best was Dr. Gary Marotta. He wasn't a Louisiana guy, but he became one and made our school better.

When I think of athletic administration, I think immediately of Terry Don Phillips and Bryan Maggard. They weren't Louisiana guys, but they came here and made our programs better.

When I think of head football coaches, Billy Napier was the best we've ever had. He wasn't a Louisiana guy, but he became one and made our school better.

Athletic in-breeding, like educational in-breeding, leads to some messed up thinking and bad habits. We've always done it this way versus let's try some fresh, new ideas.

In our current athletic environment our university needs a coach who win championships, who can hold onto talent, and who can energize the fan base. The Desmo hire did none of that. We can disagree, but that I hope you don't mind that I share that in this forum.

[JamesTheJeweler]

I do not disagree with one word you are saying. It is very fair to question the resume that was hired. I am not disputing that at all. But to say it was a hire because we wanted to save money isn’t true.

Hypothetical here. Lets say we hired Clay Helton who is now at Ga. So. for the same amount we are paying Des, would people be saying it was a budget hire? They make roughly the same now.

What people are getting hung up on is the dollar amount. In this instance, "budget" has more to do with the level of coach rather than dollar amount. I personally feel we paid too much for Des. With his level of experience, we should be paying him much less. If money was an issue as big as some claim, why are we paying that much for a coach with so little experience? And our position isn't the same as Georgia Southern. Context. We were coming off the highest level of success in program history! There were coaches out there in Napier's ilk DYING to have this job! Coaches with FAR better connections with coordinators around the country. And we could've paid him what Napier started out with here in his first year. Just not smart. Whether Des ends up being successful or not, you didnt put your money on the horse with the best odds. Can it work? God, I hope so. If we were coming off of a few down seasons, a Des hire wouldnt be as bad a choice. But doing it when we did is mind boggling. It's a textbook USL move. Either way, I pray Des gets it done. It couldn't happen to a better guy. And now that he's the coach, he deserves at least 3-4 years to prove himself. If after year 3 to 4 and we're still mediocre, middle of the road....we should be looking to a new direction. I dont think a 5th year should be automatic.

[Turbine]

I think Mike will be successful and was the right hire.

I just don't buy for one second the maintain continuity angle, to many changes across the board for continuity to roll over.

The dead pan hire didn't excite me either. I would've preferred MD be hired over someone.

That's just me.

[tdncz]

Until we start working 2 for 1 or 3 for 1 deals, nothing about current scheduling will change...

This!
Although with a much better Sun Belt in the last 2 years, my strong desire for us to go independent is somewhat fading, we do need to get these P5's back to Cajun Field - regardless of "cost" - ie, 2 for 1 or 3 for 1.
That - along with convincing CMD to take a few enthusiasm lessons from what Hud did - will help get butts in seats.

[R1Letterman]

Mike is one of our own. So was Dr. Authement.

Most wins in a season while Mike was in school here: 6
Most wins in a season while Dr A. was in school here: 6

[CajunNation]

Nope. I'll be pleasantly surprised if Mike is successful here because I don't think he has the experience necessary for the job. We could have hired better, and we should have. That's my point.

When I think about past administrators at Louisiana, I think one of the best was Dr. Gary Marotta. He wasn't a Louisiana guy, but he became one and made our school better.

When I think of athletic administration, I think immediately of Terry Don Phillips and Bryan Maggard. They weren't Louisiana guys, but they came here and made our programs better.

When I think of head football coaches, Billy Napier was the best we've ever had. He wasn't a Louisiana guy, but he became one and made our school better.

Athletic in-breeding, like educational in-breeding, leads to some messed up thinking and bad habits. We've always done it this way versus let's try some fresh, new ideas.

In our current athletic environment our university needs a coach who win championships, who can hold onto talent, and who can energize the fan base. The Desmo hire did none of that. We can disagree, but that I hope you don't mind that I share that in this forum.

Great points.

I don't think hiring a local guy is always wrong. Robe is what I think we all hope CMD becomes, but that is a tall order since CMD doesn't have the DI HC experience that Robe had before he came here.

I think the thing that is causing all of the friction here is that most of us are looking at this hire from only the viewpoint of previous experience. I believe there is another, maybe even more important reason, CMD was hired other than our hopes he become another Robe.

Remember what happened when we missed the boat to the original CUSA back in 96? Doc A pulled the plug on the program and did a political hire a couple years later. It is my belief that Doc S is doing something similar on a smaller scale.

Losing Napier, NIL, the Portal and COVID all happened at the same time. Now, we are going to play in a construction zone for a couple of years. I think Doc S looked at all of this and concluded now would be a good time to pace ourselves for a little while, and if he can get lucky and find another Robe, why not try that?

Not saying I agree with this approach, but this is exactly the way Doc A would have responded to the situation I just described, and Doc S paid attention.


... or I'm completely wrong and these are just the mindless ramblings of an old fool.

[R1Letterman]

Reminds me of tin foil concepts