. . . and what about the revenue from attendance . . . we only generally put about 18,000 in CF with two top 25 years and we finished Napier's last year with a $5.6m deficit . . . who is going to fill that hole . . . its easy to cherry pick issues and ignore the whole picture . . . that is what posters do here . . . did anyone pay attention to Dr. Fun's post where he said he was really amazed what Dr. S has done with the University with what he had to work with . . . $$$ was what he was talking about when he made that observation . . . MH bet on the come with Napier and ended with a $5.6 deficit . . .
You say that the money needed to pay Napier came from donors who stipulated that their donations were ONLY to pay Napier's salary.
We offer Billy Napier a contract guaranteeing that we will pay him $X.XX per year. Billy Napier will get paid no matter what.
What happens if that donor decides to pull his money? If that donor gets arrested? Dies?
The school is still on the hook for $2m to Billy Napier
So no matter what happens -- donors or not -- the school would have needed to find $2m per year to pay the football coach until 2025.
Which means one of the following:
1. They offered him an extension they knew he would never fulfill because he was leaving
2. They offered him an extension with a plan to at least FIGURE OUT how to pay it each year if they were forced to
If it's Option 1, then it's more pretendville BS from the university trying to play the part of a big boy program.
if it's Option 2, then if you could find it for Billy, you could find it for his replacement.
All I know Billy left the Cajuns right around the 2.1 million dollar mark and was going to be paid that plus as long as he was the coach. They had the money to pay him. He was offered 3.1 million to stay. He chose to leave. If they want to keep a coach or find a coach they will always find the money. The Source.
There are currently 24 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 24 guests)