This is a comparison of mechanics and and a rebut of the assertion that he's similar to them as an athlete and not a real qb.
As for the idea that we'd be in NY6 with a qb like them, I doubt it. They're average passers at best and Desormeaux was similar but we could barely win six games with him in the Sunbelt playing with the conference's all-time leading rusher.
Tulane made it to a NY6 with a solid QB and a dynamic RB. We finished in the top20 two years in a row with a QB who is not nearly as good at the two mentioned above. If we had those guys and they stayed healthy the whole year, we would be favored in every game except Minnesota.
Pratt is a generational type of QB who can win you games. We have had a few generational QBs, but we don’t have one getting snaps right now.
If we clean up the mistakes from last week. Get some TE help on the right side of the OL in blocking downs, this game will be over by the 3rd.
Stop and check the stats. Levi was a much better college qb than Taysom Hill. Tebow was better but wasn't good enough to stick around in the NFL as a qb because he wasn't a good enough passer. Levi's mechanics were better than his though. If he was 6'2" he probably would have made an NFL roster somewhere.
. . . because of his constant repeated evaluations on RP, Levi was doomed from the start . . .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)