Agree with all the positives and negatives posted here.
On the QB front…it is the single most important position and that player has the most control on the outcome of close games. We had a true difference maker here for 3 years. Post Levi the staff is struggling to find which one of our flawed QBs is best.
We will probably be in 4-6 one possession games and we need a leader that can sometimes make a play out of nothing. From what we have seen Woolridge and Fields are both serviceable QBs, but not the type of players to lift an offense. Chriss is intriguing but he is obviously not better because he would be starting if he was.
It will be interesting to see this season play out. Is the OL really that bad at pass protection? Do we really have stone hand TE? Should we go to a 65/35 run/pass offense?
Bottom line is the staff has a lot of work ahead. There are no obvious answers to getting the offense back to what it was 3 years ago.
When the game started I thought it was close to 20k
Offense was not on point. Hopefully they find their rhythm. Defense will keep us in every game this year. With any kind of consistency with the offense this is a 70 point game. NWST is not a good team.
Just did my rewatch......
Defense gets a solid A. They did pretty much everything expected. Played as a cohesive unit at a high level......including tackling. I don't recall any obvious missed tackles the entire game.
I'm expecting our OL/QB to improve in week 2. Kinda hard not to......they didn't sustain a single long, time consuming drive the entire game.
OL had plenty issues. BUT.....At same time.....QB has to know where his hot route is. My biggest concern after watching game again is the large # of inaccurate SHORT passes. Ben was late in finding his hot route and when he did the passes were mostly terrible. At least 5 should have been caught......at same time most of these incomplete passes were within 5-10 yards from the line of scrimmage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)