If I recall BWK went off as well, that's when I blocked them both....CMD, he ain't forgetting...
That's not true, and that's not fair.
Many of us think the world of Des because we watched him play, we watched him coach, and we've seen his dedication to this place.
For an admittedly misguided group of us, those of us who have disordered priorities, loyalty is number one, and character is part of that.
Some of us who love Des, love him for who he is, and because he walks the walk.
At this point, it is all up to Coach Des, and what he does with the program. Make UL competitive for a Sun Belt Championship, win some tough games we have no business winning, bring the team back to the top 25, and the fans will Love him. If he fails to regain what Napier attained, then it's going to be a tough road, even though he may still be the great person.
I'm glad he is motivated to prove people wrong, he should be.
First, my second sentence said that we were a much bigger commodity after Napier that we were drawing interest from coaches elsewhere and we could have investigated those routes so it is intelligible.
Second, are you saying that with our most successful run in school HISTORY, we were less attractive to an up an coming coach or a well known coach who needed another run?
We all know that we offered Napier close to $3million to stay but the offer from Florida was much higher so there is that and it doesn't fall on its face.
Also, you have no fricking idea what we could afford when we were willing to offer Napier MUCH more to stay so you are just fishing. Not a big swing and miss clown.
Cool. Thanks for clarifying! So how is Big Fish not considered loyal? Granted he didn't play here, but des didn't exactly play on (or lead) some of the best teams here. Coaches can either disloyalty leave and remain loved or overstay their welcome, are those the only two choices?
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)