Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 61

Thread: WR Room per Foote

  1. #37

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    Who led in drops?
    Last year I’d say Stevens. Peter didn’t have enough targets to lead. Obviously the more targets you get the more opportunity there is for drops. That’s true at the next level too. How many plays did you play in on Cajun field compared to peter in your career? Just curious? Weren’t you a receiver?

  2. #38

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by John Cocktolstoy View Post
    Last year I’d say Stevens. Peter didn’t have enough targets to lead. Obviously the more targets you get the more opportunity there is for drops. That’s true at the next level too. How many plays did you play in on Cajun field compared to peter in your career? Just curious? Weren’t you a receiver?
    I was processed by Gerry Baldwin. Like many others. Plus I didn’t play school very well.

    I mean we can go over my entire college career if you want to. But you’re the only one who is constantly criticizing the staff and defending the players.

  3. #39

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    I was processed by Gerry Baldwin. Like many others. Plus I didn’t play school very well.

    I mean we can go over my entire college career if you want to. But you’re the only one who is constantly criticizing the staff and defending the players.
    Well you can call it criticizing if you want. But not sure if you’d say it’s criticism of just coaches. If you watched you’d know we had guys running wide open last year and we forced it time and time again to MJ in double and triple coverage. Scheme? QB? Heck might be why Fleming and Rogers left. IMO definitely a big reason why Pete went from over 400 yards to 127. I saw someone posted his stats above. He had over 300 as a true freshman and sophomore then over 400 Covid sophomore then drop to 127. Jacob Bernard is always way to wide open also to have as little yards as he did last year as well.

  4. #40

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by John Cocktolstoy View Post
    Well you can call it criticizing if you want. But not sure if you’d say it’s criticism of just coaches. If you watched you’d know we had guys running wide open last year and we forced it time and time again to MJ in double and triple coverage. Scheme? QB? Heck might be why Fleming and Rogers left. IMO definitely a big reason why Pete went from over 400 yards to 127. I saw someone posted his stats above. He had over 300 as a true freshman and sophomore then over 400 Covid sophomore then drop to 127. Jacob Bernard is always way to wide open also to have as little yards as he did last year as well.
    It’s scheme. That’s for sure.

  5. Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    I would line "Lunch", Zeon Chriss and Chandler Fields up at WR. According to BWK each of them could probably have 400 catches, 6000 yards and 125 TD's individually this year. And would by far be the best 3 WR's on the team. Hell, I would make Ben a WR as well and move Dale Martin (who has moved to WR from QB) back to QB.


  6. #42

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginDave View Post
    I would line "Lunch", Zeon Chriss and Chandler Fields up at WR. According to BWK each of them could probably have 400 catches, 6000 yards and 125 TD's individually this year. And would by far be the best 3 WR's on the team. Hell, I would make Ben a WR as well and move Dale Martin (who has moved to WR from QB) back to QB.
    Yep LOL

  7. #43

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by John Cocktolstoy View Post
    Peter did lead in yards and catches in 21 through the championship game. He didn’t play in the bowl game and MJ passed him. He and Jacob’s lack of production last year wasn’t a peter and Jacob issue. It was a scheming and a looking at one receiver from snap until release on most plays issue. Most of the lack of production was how the OC drew it up.
    Umm, Ok. I guess its always easy to blame the scheme as its hard for either of us to prove so its a good standing ground but you've had 3 years of Leblanc and I think its pretty obvious to know what to expect. Again, I'm not saying these guys are poor players but some of you seem to think they're going to be able to put the load of the passing game on these guys backs and that's not true.

  8. #44

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    Umm, Ok. I guess its always easy to blame the scheme as its hard for either of us to prove so its a good standing ground but you've had 3 years of Leblanc and I think its pretty obvious to know what to expect. Again, I'm not saying these guys are poor players but some of you seem to think they're going to be able to put the load of the passing game on these guys backs and that's not true.
    Well in 2021 we were 13-1 best record in my lifetime. LeBlanc led the team in yards and receptions through the championship game. He did not play in the bowl game. Call it what you want.

  9. #45

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    Correct and its not like either are studs per se. Gonna have to rely on some newcomers IMO, especially the kid out of St. Martinville perhaps.
    So you want to rely on a true freshman. Name all the true freshman in the last 20 years here that had more than 300 yards receiving as a true freshman? Very risky proposition IMO.

  10. #46

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    We run a pre-snap RPO offense. It’s not a system designed to create Michael Crabtree type WRs. Post snap it’s a one read route tree. The coverage will dictate where that read will go pre-snap. It’s a big reason you see wide open WRs that never get looked at. I’m


  11. #47

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    We run a pre-snap RPO offense. It’s not a system designed to create Michael Crabtree type WRs. Post snap it’s a one read route tree. The coverage will dictate where that read will go pre-snap. It’s a big reason you see wide open WRs that never get looked at. I’m
    So you telling me when the defense gives you a false look pre snap and jump into something else at the snap were done? No checking down? I know Levi would survey the field and check down and go through his progressions. But from what I saw last year I don’t doubt what you are saying about this current O.

    I had a son play QB in high school in a more complex system where he had multiple reads on every pass play pre and post snap.

  12. #48

    Default Re: WR Room per Foote

    Quote Originally Posted by KajunKrazy View Post
    So you telling me when the defense gives you a false look pre snap and jump into something else at the snap were done? No checking down? I know Levi would survey the field and check down and go through his progressions. But from what I saw last year I don’t doubt what you are saying about this current O.

    I had a son play QB in high school in a more complex system where he had multiple reads on every pass play pre and post snap.
    Wait are you saying we run a vanilla offense?

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •