Yep he is him
Chandler will be QB1
Z may give him a hard push and make it close
Could even be a game day Blane Gauthier type situation for Z
But at the end of the day Fields will be under center
Either way I am there
We are LOUISIANA
Yep he is him
Chandler will be QB1
Z may give him a hard push and make it close
Could even be a game day Blane Gauthier type situation for Z
But at the end of the day Fields will be under center
Either way I am there
We are LOUISIANA
This could be one of the best running teams in awhile which will open the passing game for C or Z
. . . but we know the three QB’s in the running . . . no excuses for missing that especially since the bird has spoken . . .
. . . I have a couple of hobbies . . . RP is just fun especially during low sports periods . . . and sorry for those who just can’t seem to have as much fun supporting their university, it’s coaches and players . . . oh, maybe it’s because they don’t . . . get your cheese . . .
When was the very first reference/first team to use this term qb1?
Fall camp starts next week. BW will be getting all first team reps.
QB1 BW
QB2 ZC (with some playing time)
QB3 CF
I kind of like the two qb system. If we have two that are close enough to debate, seems we would gain an advantage if others who have a clear cut 1 and an inferior #2 were forced to use a two qb system for some period of time.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)