Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 61

Thread: RCAF Separation

  1. #21

    Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    …….Here we go again…..having the RCAF with the present set up means more money because it SAVES MONEY (all of the cost of everything to run it)…..ALL of the money going to RCAF is theirs…..start adding the costs of an independent RCAF……computers, paper, office space, and all that can be added to do business……it is done this way to SAVE MONEY!
    What are they “saving” it for?

  2. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Quote Originally Posted by IberiaCajun View Post
    What are they “saving” it for?
    …….the money that would go to run the RCAF FACILITY, ALONG WITH OTHER FUNCTIONING NEEDS…..would be able to now be spent on salaries, game guarantees, building upkeep, and anything else where $ that is now available would be appropriately spent!

  3. #23

    Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    …….the money that would go to run the RCAF FACILITY, ALONG WITH OTHER FUNCTIONING NEEDS…..would be able to now be spent on salaries, game guarantees, building upkeep, and anything else where $ that is now available would be appropriately spent!
    But if it were separate they could spend money on NIL

  4. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    …….Here we go again…..having the RCAF with the present set up means more money because it SAVES MONEY (all of the cost of everything to run it)…..ALL of the money going to RCAF is theirs…..start adding the costs of an independent RCAF……computers, paper, office space, and all that can be added to do business……it is done this way to SAVE MONEY!
    Serious question:

    Do they save on fund raisers?

    "Boots on the Ground" fund raisers.

    Are they saving on membership gatherers?

  5. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    . . . always thought the concept of “saving” was oversold . . . could never find a “savings account” with money in it representing the savings . . . so where did it go . . .


  6. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    . . . always thought the concept of “saving” was oversold . . . could never find a “savings account” with money in it representing the savings . . . so where did it go . . .
    Good point.

  7. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Savings is a fantasy in these situations. It’s like groceries, clothing, automobiles, etc. Advertise a percentage off, 3k off, whatever, and presented as a savings. It’s money that isn’t tangible, yet it’s suppose to make the buyer feel good.


  8. #28

    Default Re: RCAF Separation

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoomZoom View Post
    Savings is a fantasy in these situations. It’s like groceries, clothing, automobiles, etc. Advertise a percentage off, 3k off, whatever, and presented as a savings. It’s money that isn’t tangible, yet it’s suppose to make the buyer feel good.
    Especially since nearly every function Boomer suggests is provided by any bank in which RCAF would deposit its funds at little to no tangible cost to RCAF, and with NO control over the money beyond possession in trust.

  9. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    With the RCAF's edict to save money, they've let $50 mil flow under the bridge.


  10. Default Re: RCAF Separation

    . . . if only we had that “savings account” to put that in . . .


Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. #Separation
    By campo118 in forum Football
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: July 6th, 2021, 08:24 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •