Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 49

Thread: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

  1. #13

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun Monkee View Post
    SMU aiming to move to the Pac 12.

    IMHO, I think this is what is prompting this new round of reorgs.
    No doubt. How big will the PAC remnants want to get in response to being raided again? I'm thinking that the TV money won't be enough for them to consider going past the Rocky Mountains.

    Once the dust settles out west, then, it will be our time to move on the 4 schools I mentioned

  2. #14

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by cjr3888 View Post
    First I'm adding Memphis who is investing heavily in athletics and just hired Matt Riser as head coach for baseball.

    That would line up the Sun Belt West as:
    UL
    ULM
    Troy
    Arkansas State
    Memphis
    Southern Miss
    Texas State

    Second, I'm looking at Florida and the top of the list is USF. That would line up the Sun Belt East as:
    JMU
    ODU
    Marshall
    App State
    Ga State
    Ga Southern
    Coastal
    USF

    I'm not even giving a school like Tulsa a chance because they don't have a baseball program. No FCS call ups unless their budget is at least middle of the pack in the Sun Belt.

    If we drop ULM and Texas State, the next two for the west I would add are Rice & UTSA.
    Memphis and USF do not fit into the makeup of the SBC. Yes they are in the footprint, but the large metro area doesn’t fit the cultural makeup.

    UAB and ECU culturally are a better fit than Memphis, Tulane or USF.

  3. #15

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    Memphis and USF do not fit into the makeup of the SBC. Yes they are in the footprint, but the large metro area doesn’t fit the cultural makeup.

    UAB and ECU culturally are a better fit than Memphis, Tulane or USF.
    SMU, Memphis and Tulane are not just located in major markets. They are well established brands with some combination of large fanbases, large piles of money to use and recent evidence of ability to play top level football.

    Culture? We share much more culturally with Dallas, Memphis and NOLA than we will ever do with any school further east.

    Adding schools simply because they share a zip code with large population centers and offer nothing else is what gets conferences in trouble. That is not the case with the above schools.

  4. #16

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    SMU, Memphis and Tulane are not just located in major markets. They are well established brands with some combination of large fanbases, large piles of money to use and recent evidence of ability to play top level football.

    Culture? We share much more culturally with Dallas, Memphis and NOLA than we will ever do with any school further east.

    Adding schools simply because they share a zip code with large population centers and offer nothing else is what gets conferences in trouble. That is not the case with the above schools.
    His is that working for the AAC and CUSA? Are they trending up or down?

    Because the SBC is on a fricken rocket ship.

  5. #17

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    His is that working for the AAC and CUSA? Are they trending up or down?

    Because the SBC is on a fricken rocket ship.
    The AAC is repeating the exact same errors that doomed the CUSA. They added schools from large population centers that offered virtually nothing else. This is not the case for SMU, Memphis or Tulane.

  6. #18

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    The AAC is repeating the exact same errors that doomed the CUSA. They added schools from large population centers that offered virtually nothing else. This is not the case for SMU, Memphis or Tulane.
    They are not and will never be cultural fits in the SBC.

  7. Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Summertime spillover from the CSSN board. There’s a group, mainly newbies, that have a never dying b0n3r for ECU and others they think the SBC needs now. If they’re that darn unhappy already, why the heck they joined?

    AFA FCS move ups, pound sand. That’s CDOA’s lot in life now.


  8. #20

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoomZoom View Post
    Summertime spillover from the CSSN board. There’s a group, mainly newbies, that have a never dying b0n3r for ECU and others they think the SBC needs now. If they’re that darn unhappy already, why the heck they joined?

    AFA FCS move ups, pound sand.
    ECU and UAB would be fricken huge for the SBC. The only thing that would make that better would be dropping ULM and adding LaTurd, UAB and ECU.

  9. #21

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    ECU and UAB would be fricken huge for the SBC. The only thing that would make that better would be dropping ULM and adding LaTurd, UAB and ECU.
    Why would UAB be a cultural fit and not Memphis?

  10. #22

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    The AAC is repeating the exact same errors that doomed the CUSA. They added schools from large population centers that offered virtually nothing else. This is not the case for SMU, Memphis or Tulane.
    Fully agree. AAC only needed to reload with UAB, FAU, & Louisiana then call it a day. They grossly watered down their conference. As for SBC, 14 is plenty of teams. Actually 12 is enough. But it was explained there was no loss of media revenue taking in the Virginia schools- ODU and JMU plus both have a lot of moolah, so understandable.

  11. #23

    Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by cjr3888 View Post
    First I'm adding Memphis who is investing heavily in athletics and just hired Matt Riser as head coach for baseball.

    That would line up the Sun Belt West as:
    UL
    ULM
    Troy
    Arkansas State
    Memphis
    Southern Miss
    Texas State

    Second, I'm looking at Florida and the top of the list is USF. That would line up the Sun Belt East as:
    JMU
    ODU
    Marshall
    App State
    Ga State
    Ga Southern
    Coastal
    USF

    I'm not even giving a school like Tulsa a chance because they don't have a baseball program. No FCS call ups unless their budget is at least middle of the pack in the Sun Belt.

    If we drop ULM and Texas State, the next two for the west I would add are Rice & UTSA.
    No south Al? They are a young football program that is getting better every year. And their diamond sports are always strong.

  12. Default Re: Lots of talk on Twitter (no credence).

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    The AAC is repeating the exact same errors that doomed the CUSA. They added schools from large population centers that offered virtually nothing else. This is not the case for SMU, Memphis or Tulane.
    I’m sorry but not Tulane New Orleans bowl was in their own backyard and the Cajuns outnumbered them by a lot. Big city with no fan base the other really don’t know about then

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Lots of Bats
    By CajunVic in forum Baseball
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 23rd, 2021, 12:50 pm
  2. No baseball, but lots of fun for the Cajuns
    By NewsCopy in forum Baseball
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 16th, 2015, 01:01 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •