About the same.
A key difference is NIL money don't care ... at first.
Advertising is often package deals and the good money spent, is often not targeted and disappears into the sunset.
Ideally you want advertising dollars to go to an audience with disposable income AND an audience that needs and can use your product at some point in the not to distant future.
Get Gordon has never received more value in advertising as he is getting from his NIL contracts . . . gold for him . . . I perceive others are doing well also and that it is far more than most others perceive . . .
. . . you are a Cajun fan ready to make a purchase . . . you going to the vendor who advertises on TV and radio just like the other 7 in town or the one who also has contributed an NIL deal for us to keep or get the QB or Offensive Lineman on our football team . . .
NIL investors know that in reality there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of fans who know they supported their QB and Lineman . . . you can’t have it both ways . . .
Ahh making conference selections based on media markets. I thought we learned something from C-USA using that logic. It's not enough to pick a school in a major media market. What share of the market does that school command? What competition exists in that market? What is the value of the brand in that market?
My point is market size isn't enough. You must build your brand. This is getting increasingly difficult with many experiencing a decrease in disposable income and increased competition for those dollars.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)