Usually a witness to a crime who is not the victim of the crime is either a criminal or just a little too close to a criminal.
This might be a good one to assign to Peanut.
Usually a witness to a crime who is not the victim of the crime is either a criminal or just a little too close to a criminal.
This might be a good one to assign to Peanut.
I love that little Whiney Will is getting his little _____ in deep hot water. I knew something was not right when all these top guys were going to LSU, had to be a reason
He’s not indicated so there’s little chance he’s consemated a crime. But is discussing a potential price an NCAA violation?
Which means nothing will happen to him because it is not an NCAA probe. He may be guilty, probably is guilty, but unless the NCAA decides to act on the findings of the FBI, it will eventually just blow over.
Like judge Marilyn says on the People's Court, if it walks like a duck, flies like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's got to be a duck......unless you are LASU. You know they will walk away from this with no penalties.
All I know is that he is definitely getting his money's worth this year. I wonder how much he is paying his present team?
He’s closing a door so there’d be no witnesses. Again I doubt discussing what’s it going to take to deliver a player. Maybe there’s some things that aren’t violations. But I’m also sure the second financial inducements are discussed he’s obligated to let the NCAA know.
I can’t see anything really coming of this although it would be cool. If the ncaa investigates this corruption case then duke, Kansas etc are going down also and I don’t think the ncaa really wants that black cloud showing
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)