Step up and provide your thoughts instead of being a _____ . . . That is acceptable conduct . . .
Players who chose not to take money either because of loyalty to the tour, or fear of losing their ability to make a living due to threats from the PGA deserve a lion's share of the money from this "merger"/buyout. This isn't about who got paid. It's about who got screwed over.
It’s called business . . . sometimes those who are Lilly White do not end up on top. They all made business decisions. Any suit now should probably result in those who want to litigate as opposed to play, get to litigate. If they choose that path, it is quite possible that they are banned from the very organization which they stuck with and will not get to play . . . not really an option . . .
Not everyone had to take the same risk. Some didn't take the money because the tour was leading them to believe this would destroy the tour. Some had no choice but to shut up & do as told. Those people weren't given a choice, since the tour was their only viable opportunity to make a living plying their trade. They were stabbed in the back by their organization. If that isn't the very definition of an anti trust violation, then there isn't one.
I’m definitely not a GOLF guy. Is this good or bad for the sport?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)