Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 288

Thread: Analyzing the Bubble

  1. UL Baseball Analyzing the Bubble

    Taking a quick look at the candidates for the NCAA field of 64, I arrived at what I would consider 56 locks (auto/at-large bids). This leaves 8 slots for the remaining pool of candidates. There has already been one stolen bid (Xavier). There are three more possibilities tomorrow, which would reduce the 8 slots by the number of additional stolen bids. These potential stolen bids tomorrow are ...

    #165 Tulane (defeating #21 East Carolina)
    #44 UNCW or #58 Elon (defeating #32 Northeastern)
    #72 Charlotte (defeating #13 Dallas Baptist)

    The 56 that I have as locks (current RPI rank included) ...
    #21 East Carolina (Auto/At-large)
    #124 Maine (A)
    #175 George Mason (A)
    #1 Wake Forest
    #6 Clemson
    #10 Virginia
    #12 Miami
    #18 Boston College
    #22 North Carolina State
    #23 Duke
    #27 North Carolina
    Atlantic Sun winner (#57 Florida Gulf Coast or #93 Lipscomb)
    #14 Oklahoma State
    #24 West Virginia
    #30 Texas
    #34 TCU
    #25 Connecticut
    #44 Xavier (A)
    #15 Campbell (A)
    #29 Iowa
    #31 Indiana
    #37 Maryland
    #66 Cal State-Fullerton (A)
    #32 Northeastern
    #13 Dallas Baptist
    #78 Wright State (A)
    #116 Pennsylvania (A)
    #99 Rider (A)
    #101 Ball State (A)
    #9 Indiana State (A)
    Mountain West Winner (#105 San Jose State or #134 Air Force)
    Northeast Winner (#117 Central Connecticut or #234 Wagner)
    #114 Eastern Illinois (A)
    #17 Stanford
    #33 Oregon (A)
    #35 Oregon State
    #36 Washington
    #92 Army
    #2 Kentucky
    #3 Arkansas
    #4 Florida
    #5 LSU
    #7 Vanderbilt
    #8 South Carolina
    #11 Alabama
    #19 Auburn
    #20 Tennessee
    #28 Texas A&M
    #62 Samford (A)
    #108 Nicholls (A)
    #75 Oral Roberts (A)
    #16 Coastal Carolina
    #26 Southern Mississippi
    SWAC Winner (#158 Florida A&M or #168 Bethune Cookman)
    #71 Sam Houston (A)
    #81 Santa Clara (A)

    Meanwhile, the bubble teams that will be competing for the final 8 spots (less if there are more stolen bids) ...

    22 teams listed below. I took the speculative liberty of eliminating some more ... leaving 12 teams for those final spots.
    (RPI Rank and Q1 record included)
    #38 Troy (4-6)
    #39 Oklahoma (12-14)
    #40 Texas Tech (12-13)
    #41 Louisville (10-17)
    #42 Georgia (11-16)
    #44 UNCW (7-10)
    #45 Arizona (9-15-1)
    #46 Louisiana (7-9)
    #47 Kent State (0-1)
    #48 Virginia Tech (6-16)
    #49 Arizona State (8-13-1)
    #50 Cal-Irvine (3-1)
    #51 Missouri (10-21)
    #52 Mississippi State (11-22)
    #53 UC Santa Barbara (losing to Hawaii tonight ... 6-9 T5th) (6-4)
    #54 USC (8-15-1)
    #55 Kansas State 12-14)
    #56 Notre Dame (10-12)
    #58 Elon (7-8)
    #59 Wofford (3-6)
    #63 Georgia Tech (10-21)
    #69 Grand Canyon (2-7)

    It will be close, but I like what I see (for Troy and Louisiana) ... provided we do not have more than one stolen bid on Sunday,

    Brian


  2. #2

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Incredible work


  3. Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Incredible work indeed.

    Brian Benton should be a household name.

    GoneGolfin is better to postseason validity, than what Mel Kiper is to NFL Draft.


  4. #4

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Great work, as usual, Brian. But question: what was your reasoning eliminating Louisville and Georgia?


  5. #5

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    WOW Brian, very appreciated appreciative of your educated contribution to our board as we all hold our breath for the big game today and the possibility of needing an at large bid. Let's hope we put this __ er to rest today!!


  6. #6

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Quote Originally Posted by angeleast View Post
    WOW Brian, very appreciated appreciative of your educated contribution to our board as we all hold our breath for the big game today and the possibility of needing an at large bid. Let's hope we put this __ er to rest today!!
    I’ll be happy when a .500 record or better in your conferences regular season is a requirement for an at large bid.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Appreciate you, Brian


  8. Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    very interesting and informative, hopefully the committee puts half as much time in to the analysis of these numbers as you did


  9. Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Quote Originally Posted by Jacob81 View Post
    I’ll be happy when a .500 record or better in your conferences regular season is a requirement for an at large bid.
    and bowls in football

  10. #10

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    D1 baseball projections this morning has us in the tournament as the last team in. It has us going to Lsu regional as the 3 seed.


  11. #11

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Excellent work......

    We only need 1 stolen bid today......starts at 1 in Montgomery AL


  12. #12

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Appreciate you Brian! Impressive!


  13. #13

  14. #14

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    Brain, how many years as the Sun Belt gotten 4 teams in? It’s not unprecedented, but not common. I seem to remember the year we went to the CWS, we got 4-5 teams in.


  15. #15

    Default Re: Analyzing the Bubble

    4 teams seems high for Sunbelt


Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4 11 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 25th, 2022, 05:43 am
  2. Bubble Watch
    By lxa656 in forum Basketball
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 24th, 2005, 07:08 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •