On an individual basis, it could be argued that depriving a player of a pro draft status deprives him of his right to make more money.
Of course the counter argument will point to the max a few collegians are making. However it was an individual basis case that initially started working it's way to Supreme Court.
Anybody know the story?
Tulane? Really?
Lol wtf
Des for pres
I say we play hard ball. Look there are 3,4, possibly 5 star athletes riding the bench at a these big colleges. I say we go after them, with a chance to start. That is something that a P-5 can’t really offer unless you ride the bench for 2 yrs and even then they may not get to start. Hit the portal and offer a chance to start.
Second thing if a player enters the transfer portal revoke there scholarship! If you don’t want to play here we don’t need you. Time to play hard ball.
If you enter and you don’t get a scholarship oh well to bad so sad your scholarship has been revoked!
Player will think twice before entering that transfer portal.
Wtf? He seriously left for Tulane?? I can understand a P5 but Tulane?? I know they don't have NIL money
I thought you went to Tulame if you had a lot of money to pay not if you were interested in getting paid . . .
Tulane is the latest shiny object. We were that new shiny object 2 years ago. Shiny objects attract people not worried about substance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)