I would have feelings of disappointment in the moment if we didn’t make the NCAA tournament and finished 1st in the league. I had the same for the 2017-2018 season. I wanted to win the tournament and we didn’t. That does not make the season objectively a disappointment. That season could have still been a huge success for our program if we did something with it. Unfortunately we flushed that momentum with a quickness.
A lot of people are tournament or bust. I’m just not one of them. I also think Marlin should be retained if he wins the regular season title.
In actuality, the new requirements to have a minimum no. of D1 home games will hurt our NET rating and also may hurt financially. NET has replaced the RPI in basketball. NET still considers strength of schedule in the calculations. That is because we will move from paying 10 grand to Xavier of New Orleans to paying 60 grand to Southern for CajunDome visits. The game Xavier counts as far as NCAA statistics go but is ignored in the NET calculations while the game against Southern will be considered and likely is a negative to the NET. Despite all that, I strongly support the new requirements. A game against a SWAC team still does more to prepare you for conference play than a game against NAIA competition does. They still put D1 athletes on the court and are on scholarship. Playing 3 non D1 games is also not fair to your season ticket holders and encourages no walk up sales unless there is a local player on the opponent.
Thanks Mike, appreciate the posts. Know this isn’t the first time you’ve explained this.
210 211 Grambling SWAC 9-7 4-6 1-1 4-0 0-3 2-1 0-1 7-2
219 216 Southern U. SWAC 7-10 3-9 1-1 3-0 0-3 0-3 0-1 7-3
246 245 Alcorn SWAC 8-10 4-8 1-1 3-1 0-3 1-4 1-1 6-2
274 273 Prairie View SWAC 5-13 2-10 0-1 3-2 0-4 1-0 0-3 4-6
306 305 Ark.-Pine Bluff SWAC 5-11 2-11 0-0 3-0 0-5 0-1 0-3 5-2
314 314 Texas Southern SWAC 4-14 1-9 1-1 2-4 0-4 1-2 0-2 3-6
318 320 Jackson St. SWAC 5-14 2-12 0-2 3-0 0-3 0-5 1-1 4-5
330 330 Alabama St. SWAC 5-13 1-13 1-0 3-0 0-3 0-3 0-3 5-4
348 348 Alabama A&M SWAC 3-13 0-6 0-1 3-6 0-2 0-1 0-3 3-7
352 353 Bethune-Cookman SWAC 4-13 1-10 1-1 2-2 0-3 0-0 0-3 4-7
357 357 Mississippi Val. SWAC 2-19 0-15 0-2 2-2 0-4 0-4 0-3 2-8
358 358 Florida A&M SWAC
THIS!!!!!!!!!!
If we build on the 2018 season without using it as a crutch to underachieve the following years, none of us are having this conversation. What the past 4 years has turned into is bunch of justifications for mediocrity as well as constantly promoting complacency.
Constantly promoting complacency is why we have averaged 6th place in the Sun Belt over the last 4 years with the highest paid coach at the helm up until this season.
Constantly promoting complacency is why the fan base is divided in the direction of our team.
Constantly promoting complacency is why our fans are proceeding with caution in spite of being tied for 1st place in conference as if an expectation of a end of season meltdown is somehow inevitable.
Constantly promoting complacency is why if we win the conference this season, there's a large number of fans worried that the following years will be followed with the same old, same old of middle-of-the-pack quality of basketball.
I love the fact that this team is playing the way they are right now. The biggest concern that I have is whether or not it can be maintained moving forward once the 2022-2023 season comes to a close. That part I don't know because it hasn't in the past.
Scheduling sucks. But if UL can’t get more creative than flipping 6 or 7 SWAC games or starts H/H with SWAC teams I’m out. That was the line in the sand with Fletcher and still is for me today. Scheduling a league, who today, has half their teams with a lower net ranking than the SBC’s worst team is stupid. It’s bad enough we have McLeast and UNO, bottom 10% teams on the schedule. So why add teams that drag your program further down? The MAC deal is ESPN just keeping us in our place, two one bid leagues battling it out gains nothing.
We all know that. You don't have to keep repeating it. The bottom line is that you keep saying its all about those few days in March. As if all other games are not important to gauge the successfulness of a given season and that is and should not be the way the program thinks.
Get above 20 PPG, psychologically it may.
Toney and Bo stuck around awhile professionally.
EP had moments in the pros, but he, nor anyone else that’s come thru matches the “generational talent” of those two guys. Which is another reason why we have no fresh banners in the dome, nor should we.
Long was dominate, but against who and did the team flourish?
Toney and Bo were “money” 90% of the time. Haven’t see that in decades.
There are currently 15 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 15 guests)