New NCAA Rule Spells End for Transfer Portal's "Wild West"

[JMV JustMyView]

Agreed, if the amount of years remaining is the same. From a G5 perspective, getting a transfer that has 1 or 2 years remaining still seems like a bad investment to me.

Not if they are a plug and play(immediate impact player)with an immediate need to fill a spot.

[CajunEXPRESS]

Not if they are a plug and play(immediate impact player)with an immediate need to fill a spot.

Those low risk players probably getting way more NIL than we can afford. Again diamond like that are more likely out of high school. Missing on high school is a one year miss not necessarily 2-3 years.

[Atown cajun]

Cajuns better step up their portal game. The Necksters just got a commitment from Boise’s 3 year starter at QB. Cajuns have to play the game by the new rules.

[CajunEXPRESS]

Doesn’t look like their DOA conferece is hurting their recruiting prospects.

Wonder what their Lafayette quarterback thinks about that new guy.

[CajunVic]

I see it differently. The NCAA’s attempt to rein this in is actually the doorway out for the P5 football leagues. The courts rulings regarding player movement trumps the NCAA.

They simply say bye bye when those leaving all get on board. Case in point, Texas and OU trying to get to the SEC sooner.

End up with 2 different organizations, no monopoly.

And I’m NOT a fan of basketball or any sport going from 64 to 90. If your league’s best MBB team has a NET greater than 90, it’s still a one bid league but with 90 slices of money instead of 64.

The courts only spoke on NIL, not on player movement . . .