I hate reading something and possibly reading something into it so apologies if I’m missing your point.
But what I’m getting out of this is that you lay the responsibility of marketing the football team on the athletic Director and the university president, but not on the head football coach?
I won’t argue it was a great season. Bc losing 1 game all season is a very tough accomplishment.
However, the general public still views Cajun football as mid-level football. Reality is, when we play ranked teams (or really any big name P5 school), the expectation is that we will lose.
For baseball & softball, the expectation is that we will compete and have a legitimate shot of winning those games.
Look at the difference in attendance for the Diamond sports vs football.
15,000 average is actually pretty good when you look at the entire 4-years.
- A charisma bypass.
- A 7-7 season.
- A winning season that may have led to bigger attendance was rewarded with a lock down season.
- A lockout season.
- An open season while still in a pandemic.
Did I mention he had a charisma bypass?
I’m not sure what a charisma bypass is but he wears the worst head do in college football . . . can’t really call it hair do cause there really is no hair there . . .
You're not far off in guessing my thoughts on that. Granted, it's great to have a head coach who also has the ability to promote the program. However, I want my coach's primary focus to be WINNING. The university should have people employed to promote the program, ESPECIALLY if it's a winning program like Napier built.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 17 guests)