Another one in the boat....Mason Clinton

[CajunT]

Well 2/3 of our commits are zero stars. Coaches def have their work cut out for them. We're ranked nearly at the bottom of our conference. Only ahead of ODU, JMU and ULM. It's a little concerning seeing this much of a drop off.

No one runs the UL site on any platform. Even kids like Bragg that had offers is not ranked. Had he committed to Missouri, he would be ranked. They will update the classes after signing day and in February after NSD.

[cajun tom]

Well 2/3 of our commits are zero stars. Coaches def have their work cut out for them. We're ranked nearly at the bottom of our conference. Only ahead of ODU, JMU and ULM. It's a little concerning seeing this much of a drop off.

Number one on average ranking I believe 84.1 on 247 recruiting site.

[CajunEXPRESS]

No one runs the UL site on any platform. Even kids like Bragg that had offers is not ranked. Had he committed to Missouri, he would be ranked. They will update the classes after signing day and in February after NSD.

If Maggard was willing to accept #1 recruiting classes accolades, then he can’t poo poo less complimentary rankings. I’d suspect he’d simply ignore them.

[JamesTheJeweler]

No one runs the UL site on any platform. Even kids like Bragg that had offers is not ranked. Had he committed to Missouri, he would be ranked. They will update the classes after signing day and in February after NSD.

I gotcha. I guess I'm just looking at other schools that we should be outperforming like Tech. When I look at their class, every single commit is a ranked 3 star, where 2/3 of ours have zero rank. And looking at our classes over the last several years, this year is a pretty steep drop off. It's concerning.

[JamesTheJeweler]

Number one on average ranking I believe 84.1 on 247 recruiting site.

That's only because it's according to ranked commits. It doesn't take into account for zero ranked commits. 2/3 of our commits are a zero.

[CajunVic]

Fear not . . . we com’n . . .

[CajunT]

I gotcha. I guess I'm just looking at other schools that we should be outperforming like Tech. When I look at their class, every single commit is a ranked 3 star, where 2/3 of ours have zero rank. And looking at our classes over the last several years, this year is a pretty steep drop off. It's concerning.

Tech has had presence on Rivals. They have had it for a number of years.

Bragg is one example and I will give you another. UL commit LB Justin Horne has offers from UL, Troy, Texas Tech, Baylor and others but he's not rated on 247?

There are some projects in this class, but there are some good ones after losing Carpenter, Fobbs, Martin and a few others as well.

[Boomer]

Tech has had presence on Rivals. They have had it for a number of years.

Bragg is one example and I will give you another. UL commit LB Justin Horne has offers from UL, Troy, Texas Tech, Baylor and others but he's not rated on 247?

There are some projects in this class, but there are some good ones after losing Carpenter, Fobbs, Martin and a few others as well.

…….WELL without getting into the rankings too much I can remember Coach Des saying at a QB meeting when kinda forced on recruiting mid season…….he mentioned that we were well on our way with about 17 commitments……obviously these guys were offered and accepted for good reasons……surely we couldn’t have lost all these guys!

[CajunVic]

or lost On all of these guys (the ones not ranked) . . . T, is having no one “running the platform” an example of personnel lost but not replaced. . .

[fanof71]

This board has the same discussion every recruiting cycle....

[Turbine]

This board has the same discussion every recruiting cycle....

Yeah but we change the names yearly to protect the innocent.

[cjr3888]

or lost On all of these guys (the ones not ranked) . . . T, is having no one “running the platform” an example of personnel lost but not replaced. . .

The schools don't run the platforms, fans run them.