Who gets to decide which sport is more important? What’s the criteria? Wouldn’t attendance be something to look at? While you’re bringing up attendance to volleyball, it was free to get in so it’s not a fair comparison. Also a men’s national championship in basketball would garner far more attention than a women’s softball natty. It’s why big fish gets paid 600k and glasco makes what he makes 170k.
Looking at the crowds? If half of them need walkers or canes they’re not gonna survive long.
Vic, this is a race to the bottom. Football attendance is not good for completely different reasons. MBB has a coach on his 13 year and a team that is 8-1. We shouldn't be scraping the bottom for butts in seats. Yet, here we are. Let's diagnose the problem rather than whatboutism. It's like the Alden report stated.. "I've never seen a school with 4 different fanbases."
Football's problems have nothing to do with MBB problems.
Support of the program decides the importance. MBB has little to no support, except the Social Club which you seem to be a part of. Glasco has more conference championships than all UL coaches combined and Marlin will be gone before Glasco is gone. Lets look at attendance. MBB had 1000 actual folks in the dome, softball gets 1500 to 1800 actual folks per game. Give up you dream of MBB at UL ever winning a natty.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)