Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 13 to 18 of 18

Thread: ot: speaking of UGA

  1. Default Re: ot: speaking of UGA

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    You are legal only when you don’t want to be noticed . . .
    "Louisiana" gets you noticed and is legal.

    "Louisiana" is so legal academics can use it.

  2. #14

    Default Re: ot: speaking of UGA

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    We already use LA on the ticker, only because it's 100% legal.

    ULA and UL are technically illegal. LA is not.
    good point

    p.s. i wasnt in favor of ULA over UL, just was an idea for how to combat ULL or UL-L

  3. #15

    Default Re: ot: speaking of UGA

    anyone think it is odd that we have to spend money on branding, yet the “big teams” are not only given more money by espn yet are also given the branding for free. one might call that a double dip, i.e. the rich get richer. imagine the things we could buy if we didnt spent it on branding and conversely could limit what “they” can buy if they had to constantly up spend their branding efforts


  4. #16

    Default Re: ot: speaking of UGA

    the funniest that espn never questions is in baseball/softball when alabama has “Bama” across their chest yet an “A” on their cap, huh?

    Attached Images Attached Images    

  5. #17

    Default Re: ot: speaking of UGA

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun tom View Post
    Whenever someone says ULL we could say not ULL it’s ULA.
    Then we’d get u La La’ed to death.

  6. #18

    Default Re: ot: speaking of UGA

    and once they join the sec i am sure the mighty sooners will never be asked how can the University of Oklahoma be OU, shouldnt it be UO?


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •