anyone think it is odd that we have to spend money on branding, yet the “big teams” are not only given more money by espn yet are also given the branding for free. one might call that a double dip, i.e. the rich get richer. imagine the things we could buy if we didnt spent it on branding and conversely could limit what “they” can buy if they had to constantly up spend their branding efforts
the funniest that espn never questions is in baseball/softball when alabama has “Bama” across their chest yet an “A” on their cap, huh?
and once they join the sec i am sure the mighty sooners will never be asked how can the University of Oklahoma be OU, shouldnt it be UO?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)