Offensive Line !!

[Old-DaBoot]

All I’m saying is the o line played good enough to win ((( in the 2nd Half)))). Nope not blaming 1 guy . The fumble drive was a big dagger . Just want to see the best option at each position . When this happens and the games change I will politely remind the ones that don’t believe my points . Love this team no Matter what and never miss a game .

We are LOUISIANA

[Turbine]

All I’m saying is the o line played good enough to win . Nope not blaming 1 guy . The fumble drive was a big dagger . Just want to see the best option at each position . When this happens and the games change I will politely remind the ones that don’t believe my points . Love this team no Matter what and never miss a game .

We are LOUISIANA

Definitly could have won (and easily) by leaving the O-Line play as it was and changing a few other things that happened along the way.

[ragincajun97]

They were better in the second half but they were still bad.

[ragincajun97]

Definitly could have won (and easily) by leaving the O-Line play as it was and changing a few other things that happened along the way.

But I agree with this. If we don’t fumble that changes the whole game. If we score
There we have all the momentum and plenty of time down two scores

[BeauCajun]

Anyone hear why Jax Harrington was out?

[Million$Mullet]

They were better in the second half but they were still bad.

Exactly.

[SMD7636]

I don’t like the “if” game. We don’t practice to get lucky. We practice to win the game and not leave it to chance. We are not a good football team.

[Turbine]

I don’t like the “if” game. We don’t practice to get lucky. We practice to win the game and not leave it to chance. We are not a good football team.

You are 100% correct.

Keep in mind though, "practice" is nothing but an "if" game.

Every scenario covered in practice is an "if" scenario.

So when it come to analyzing a game, covering the missed ifs, is only natural.