Can we get some sort of clue on who this person is in Communications and Marketing? Title? Initials? We know its a female, so that rules out Eric M.
Can we get some sort of clue on who this person is in Communications and Marketing? Title? Initials? We know its a female, so that rules out Eric M.
The University NEEDS a brick and mortar "Red Zone Sports" store at the athletic complex. With a _____load of LOUISIANA, CAJUNS, RAGIN CAJUNS merchandise. NOTHING with Lafayette on it. Keep that crap on the main campus for those that want to support education with the institution's name.
Also, at "Red Zone Sports" sell gameday tickets and parking THERE too! Get a shirt, get a hat, get your tickets, get a game day parking pass, etc, etc.
And for Pete's sake GET RID of the Barnes and Noble, corporate level BS! That was the biggest mistake!
Sam's First Season? Who was in this position years past? Did they go with Napier?
The person in question is not in this screen shot.
I think we're stuck with B&N for the long haul now. I was trying to find an email related to that Jonathon Clark fellow that Dr. Maggard provided a telephone number for in order to send some examples of logo and gear I'd love to see in the fan shop. Couldn't find one. May just give him a call.
Want to pick that person out yourself?
https://ragincajuns.com/staff-directory
Or are you referring to someone from Martin Hall?
I’m not sure our efforts are best spent trying to pinpoint this one person. Coming up with a clear and concise message co-signed by as many alumni and fans as possible directed to the office as a whole could get the ball rolling. See who provides the loudest objections and the person or persons out themselves.
The goal here, to me, is to get this person to give explanations as to why our policy with regard to our brand and licensing is to keep it from being spread far and wide rather than promoting growth. Explain why it's so hard and cost prohibitive for others to do business with the licensing office. Explain why we can never get any traction with the mascot conversation.
If the explanations are valid, we'll accept them and just learn to live in a world where one of the most unique monikers in sports today must be kept under wraps. If not, we have an open dialogue about how this office can evolve into the 21st century so that our name can be monetized the way it should be.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)