That would never happen in a remodeled Louisiana stadium . . .
Unfortunately, hiring and firing of coaches in big boy football is never something where you can just "look at the numbers". You look at the situation at hand and get a handshake deal from a booster for the money you need. I'm led to believe that no booster was willing to fork over any more for CMD and that's why he's making 750k. If Dr. M would have taken some time to find a good candidate AND made the effort to sell his hire, he could have convinced boosters to come up with the difference and we'd be paying 7 figures for a coach. To the question of is UL athletics broke? It's not a simple yes or no. Oklahoma State was "broke" until T Boone decided to bring in the dumptruck of cash.
Why is this being asked on a forum of supporters already donating?Is UL Athletics Broke? SHOW ME THE MONEY
We don’t get paid $400,000 per year to answer that or to fix it.
Beno Cooke once said (and I'm probably paraphrasing) that "college athletic programs spend to their needs."
And they need to spend all of it (I added this).
In the last decade, both Texas and Tennessee have both had to reach to their repspective universities for help in solving budget deficits.
Did we overextend ourselves during the Covid years grasping out the brass ring or did we want to present the illusion everything was okay? When other programs were cutting back on staff, salaries, and sports, I don't think we did the same. So I think its a little of both.
Actually a lot of both.
It took CBN 4 years to build this program up to where it was (and Lafayette/Acadiana still refused to put 25k butts in Cajun Field). He took what he built and brought it to Florida, and Mike had all of 6 weeks to regain that momentum.
We here talk of the 3% percent alotment for athletics from the University budget that isn't being utilized; there's a 2% cap set by Authement and continued by Savoie.
Just a thought on this regard: allegedly we had offered CBN $3.2 million to stay (but Florida more than doubled that so its a moot point). What if Savoie sits on this extra 1% (which admittedly could be a substantial amount) specifically for these purposes? To me, this would be a prudent move on Savoie's part.
To Jay's point, Mike's salary is commensurate with his place in the pecking order.
I hope people wouldn't have expected Maggard to take the potential $3.2 million offered to Napier and offer to somebody else.
They spend to their needs and they need to spend it.
We wouldn't have them do it any other way.
People have said on this board that we should be that stepping stone. If that's the case, we have to prepared for this scenario.
Who said it was not competitive.
The point is that CMD's salary would not have been sufficient to attract the caliber of coach with the expected experience being demanded on this board and so as to those potential candidates, Louisiana was broke in that they did not have enough money to compete for their employment.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)