Scheduling

[Grantvb]

Been saying that for 2 seasons. (1) SEC; (1) Big12 and (1) AAC team in Non conference. The 4th game should be in-state school

[ragin50]

FCS games will always be a part of the schedule and they should be. We need a warm-up game on the schedule. And perhaps even more importantly, we need a FCS game every year to get to 6 home games. And let's be honest, HBCUs and in-state FCS schools are much bigger draws than most Sun Belt schools. We had 25k last year for Nicholls. And the only reason we didn't come close to that for SLU this year is because the weather was atrocious.

Where we really need to improve scheduling is with our two G5 slots. Eastern Michigan and NMSU just don't cut it anymore. Tulane, La Tech, and even Rice are good local matchups, but our focus should be on scheduling top AAC and Mtn. West schools.

Of course we all know it's easier said than done. I'm sure if schools like SMU or Memphis were interested in home/home's with us it would already be on the schedule.

Why do you need a warm-up game against an inferior opponent? You have spring and fall camp to prepare for the season and get ready to play. And the weather Saturday was anything but atrocious, no rain during the game and it wasn't hot. People that need near ideal weather before they come out are not real fans.

[Esqueleto]

Why do you need a warm-up game against an inferior opponent? You have spring and fall camp to prepare for the season and get ready to play. And the weather Saturday was anything but atrocious, no rain during the game and it wasn't hot. People that need near ideal weather before they come out are not real fans.

AMEN!

[Big Buds]

Stop this FCS nonsense effective immediately!

[GeauxCajuns]

obviously its not quantifiable because we would never be able to know, but if FSU didnt play duquesne (a warm up game) that matchup in the Dome could have gone differently. they had a week to work out some kinks that you dont get in fall camp or in spring ball.

[UL_Cajuns]

I know we were ranked in the Top 25 the last two years, but does anyone truly believe we were a legitimate top 12 program either year? Does anyone truly believe we're on track to be a legitimate top 12 program in the near future? So why would we blame our schedule on not getting into the playoffs?

This whole argument puts the cart before the horse. If we get to a point where we can legitimately beat 2 good P5 schools every year then by all means let's change the schedule. But right now we can't. Until then, I like Maggard's philosophy of scheduling one winnable P5 school every year so we can shoot our shot and still get 6 home games every year.

Yes

[GeauxCajuns]

Stop this FCS nonsense effective immediately!

you say that, but, there are over 100 fbs/fcs matchups this year. i wouldnt call it nonsense, i would call it common.

[CajunNation]

Over the last several years, the NY6 G5 school had at least 2 P5/Top20 wins. Most years, the number was 3 or higher.

Going forward, if you can't get in-conference Top20 wins, you better have at least 2 P5 games scheduled, or you aren't getting anyway near the playoffs.

The obvious move to make here is to convert 1 of the slots for the non-conference G5 games to a P5 game.

Like I've said before, you keep your P5 payday slot and use the other P5 slot to work P5 home games every 4th year or so.

A serious football program would do this.

[CajunT]

FCS games will always be a part of the schedule and they should be. We need a warm-up game on the schedule. And perhaps even more importantly, we need a FCS game every year to get to 6 home games. And let's be honest, HBCUs and in-state FCS schools are much bigger draws than most Sun Belt schools. We had 25k last year for Nicholls. And the only reason we didn't come close to that for SLU this year is because the weather was atrocious.

Where we really need to improve scheduling is with our two G5 slots. Eastern Michigan and NMSU just don't cut it anymore. Tulane, La Tech, and even Rice are good local matchups, but our focus should be on scheduling top AAC and Mtn. West schools.

Of course we all know it's easier said than done. I'm sure if schools like SMU or Memphis were interested in home/home's with us it would already be on the schedule.

I agree with your assessment. The one area that needs improvement is in playing the Top of the G5. The question is as you stated, are they willing to do a 1-for-1? I'm not against agreeing to 2-for-1 deals for a P5 program to come to Lafayette if the deal is break even at worst. The problem I've heard is that in conversations held with P5 programs, the payout for our two trips were reduced significantly enough that is wasn't worth further discussion. I don't know which programs were involved in those discussions.

[CajunRebel]

Over the last several years, the NY6 G5 school had at least 2 P5/Top20 wins. Most years, the number was 3 or higher.

Going forward, if you can't get in-conference Top20 wins, you better have at least 2 P5 games scheduled, or you aren't getting anyway near the playoffs.

The obvious move to make here is to convert 1 of the slots for the non-conference G5 games to a P5 game.

Like I've said before, you keep your P5 payday slot and use the other P5 slot to work P5 home games every 4th year or so.

A serious football program would do this.

Ok, but if we do a 3 for 1 with a P5 it means one of two things will happen:

1. We’ll lose a home game 3 out of every 4 years.
2. We replace a G5 game for another FCS game every 3 years to keep 6 home games.

———

To put it another way:
-6 home games/yr
-2 G5 games/yr (instead of 2 FCS)
-A series with a P5.
Pick 2 of the above. We can’t have all 3.