Page 29 of 32 FirstFirst ... 19 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LastLast
Results 281 to 290 of 313

Thread: Football Attendance Comparison

  1. Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaston Thibodeaux View Post
    Definitely don’t think it is the best solution. The idea might have actually been back in the Andrew Dumond days when Dr A had them hand cuffed and they were looking for little solutions to a big problem. It was basically fencing off parking lot and would be only bodies where the hill was. Those top payers could flow to and fro their TG during a game. Probably not ideal with a new stadium. This was back in the 90s thinking out the box.
    Often out of the box thinking (like this) even if it hits a dead end, can lead to other unique solutions.

    So I'm all for the exercise.

  2. #282

    Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Minimal return on the terrain destruction.

    Four Oaks would have to go, and only about 5 or 6 tailgate spots would benefit.
    Football fields are 160 feet wide

  3. Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Football fields are 160 feet wide
    Ok then this would be for the benifit of what, 8 tailgate spots?

  4. #284

    Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Ok then this would be for the benifit of what, 8 tailgate spots?
    That is not the way it would work. The game would have been open to all end zone TG spots with free flow in and out during game.

  5. #285

    Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaston Thibodeaux View Post
    That is not the way it would work. The game would have been open to all end zone TG spots with free flow in and out during game.
    I thought about that concept a few weeks ago. Putting an endzone wide "biergarten" up above the NEZ grass hill and converting that area into a tailgate atmosphere within the stadium, but then you gotta deal with the fans that will be upset that the kids lose their grassy daycare.

    The SEZ kind of has the beginnings of that concept, where people go get their beer and visit with friends on the concourse while watching the game below.

  6. Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaston Thibodeaux View Post
    That is not the way it would work. The game would have been open to all end zone TG spots with free flow in and out during game.
    There is a reason seating is sloped and flat decks are perched high.

    Line of sight.

  7. #287

    Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by RedTails View Post
    I thought about that concept a few weeks ago. Putting an endzone wide "biergarten" up above the NEZ grass hill and converting that area into a tailgate atmosphere within the stadium, but then you gotta deal with the fans that will be upset that the kids lose their grassy daycare.

    The SEZ kind of has the beginnings of that concept, where people go get their beer and visit with friends on the concourse while watching the game below.
    Just have a viewing deck cut into the hill and a tunnel back into the bar.

  8. #288

    Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Ok then this would be for the benifit of what, 8 tailgate spots?
    You wouldn’t have a tailgate spot like you do outside that each person has a 20 by 20. That just the playing field not the width of the entire field. More like 15 foot spots, and all you have to do is sell them for more than the seats you are selling in the north end zone currently, anybody know how much those are?

  9. #289

    Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun_lannister View Post
    Just have a viewing deck cut into the hill and a tunnel back into the bar.
    That’s more what I was thinking..have a couple levels of party patios/tailgate type areas. Similar to the SW end zone but a little bigger

  10. Default Re: Football Attendance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    You wouldn’t have a tailgate spot like you do outside that each person has a 20 by 20. That just the playing field not the width of the entire field. More like 15 foot spots, and all you have to do is sell them for more than the seats you are selling in the north end zone currently, anybody know how much those are?
    Then there is no reason to chop the levee level.

    UL explored the designated deck concept in the 2010's albeit only one.

    I think if the were several conpanion decks it would have done better.

Page 29 of 32 FirstFirst ... 19 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bowl Game Attendance Summary and Comparison
    By HoustonCajun in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: January 12th, 2012, 09:38 am
  2. College football rankings comparison.
    By Zeebart21 in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 2nd, 2008, 11:31 pm
  3. NIT not too shabby (using a football comparison)
    By Turbine in forum Basketball
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 22nd, 2005, 02:29 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •