Defining Season!

[HOUCajun]

LMAO ! That was such a fun day

Not my most productive work day for sure!

[cajun_lannister]

Not my most productive work day for sure!

I remember sitting at legends with a friend who just had lunch with Jim Harris. Jim had told him that we had hired Napier but was not telling me to be an ass lol. All he would tell me its not Pry or Todd Orlando I was deep into twitter than afternoon trying to find anything.

[HoustonCajun]

You are correct in stating Dr. Maggard didn't use the P5 model in hiring Coach Des. And while it might be the preferred model by most, it's not exactly the only way to success. App State has been the conference's most consistent program and they have remained in house with hires.

Coach Stokely and Coach Bustle came from national championship programs and were decent coaches. But neither elevated the program to a Top 25 ranking. Billy Napier did it in three years of being hired, but there is no guarantee that you will capture the proverbial genie in the bottle again.

Our program under Napier built a national presence and a Top 25 ranking. With Napier's leaving along with key coaches and players, that national perception seems to be lost as we are not mentioned anywhere on a national level today. I feel certain that if Napier were still here, our name would surface in a Top 25 ranking and be mentioned similar to USF, Memphis and SMU for a future spot in the Big 12. We are now in a wait and see mode if Coach Desormeaux can continue the success that Napier had. It only took one major win over Iowa State to elevate Napier's status upon which he continued to build. Des won't get a similar opportunity until we play Florida State in November. If UL is undefeated going into that game, it will be another marquee game and Des' opportunity to get us back to a prominent national position and possible ranking. Fortunately, we appear to be reloading rather than rebuilding, although depth may be a concern. Expectations are high, as they should be for a program that has been so successful in the past 4 years. I see no reason Des can't be as successful as Napier in his first year. He is more of a sure bet as head coach than Napier was when he was hired. He is certainly more vested in this program, his program, and it is time for all of Acadiana to come out and support him and our team as he leads us to even greater heights. That this program can't sell 15,000 season tickets, average over 5,000 student attendance and 30,000 a game minimally for a program that has been this successful over the past 4 years is hard to figure. With all UL has achieved athletically and now academically, it has certainly earned that level of support.

[KajunKrazy]

You are correct in stating Dr. Maggard didn't use the P5 model in hiring Coach Des. And while it might be the preferred model by most, it's not exactly the only way to success. App State has been the conference's most consistent program and they have remained in house with hires.

Coach Stokely and Coach Bustle came from national championship programs and were decent coaches. But neither elevated the program to a Top 25 ranking. Billy Napier did it in three years of being hired, but there is no guarantee that you will capture the proverbial genie in the bottle again.

Coach Stokley was the best coach from an X's and O's stand point this school has ever had. If he would have coached in this era and played the schedules we are playing today he would have been every bit as good as napier or better record wise. Go look at his schedules half his games were against schools that are in the SEC or big 12 today. And he still managed winning seasons.

[Cajunrunner]

Coach Stokley was the best coach from an X's and O's stand point this school has ever had. If he would have coached in this era and played the schedules we are playing today he would have been every bit as good as napier or better record wise. Go look at his schedules half his games were against schools that are in the SEC or big 12 today. And he still managed winning seasons.

It also helps not to have a University President whose agenda is to financially starve athletics.

[CajunT]

Coach Stokley was the best coach from an X's and O's stand point this school has ever had. If he would have coached in this era and played the schedules we are playing today he would have been every bit as good as napier or better record wise. Go look at his schedules half his games were against schools that are in the SEC or big 12 today. And he still managed winning seasons.

I'm well aware of the history. I have two friends that were on that staff, including one that is no longer with us today. My point was, hiring coaches from the P5 model doesn't always guarantee success and we literally captured the proverbial genie in the bottle with the hiring of Billy Napier. I'm not sure that success will be duplicated again.

[ULGrad@HOU]

I'm well aware of the history. I have two friends that were on that staff, including one that is no longer with us today. My point was, hiring coaches from the P5 model doesn't always guarantee success and we literally captured the proverbial genie in the bottle with the hiring of Billy Napier. I'm not sure that success will be duplicated again.

Success is never, ever guaranteed. You try and make decisions to increase your chances of success. That's all you can do.

[Big Poppa]

I'm well aware of the history. I have two friends that were on that staff, including one that is no longer with us today. My point was, hiring coaches from the P5 model doesn't always guarantee success and we literally captured the proverbial genie in the bottle with the hiring of Billy Napier. I'm not sure that success will be duplicated again.

I do know that football success is built from January to September which we don’t get to see what napier did differently that made him better. On the Saturday nights watching the play calling and game management, the things we get to see, he wasn’t that much better than any other. He had some good breaks and won most of the close ones, can’t argue with the record.

I for one think that if there was no such thing as a Covid year and Billy was breaking in a new QB last year, he’d still be the Cajuns coach. Even the super Sr thing worked out perfectly for him. It was the perfect storm.

[CajunT]

I do know that football success is built from January to September which we don’t get to see what napier did differently that made him better. On the Saturday nights watching the play calling and game management, the things we get to see, he wasn’t that much better than any other. He had some good breaks and won most of the close ones, can’t argue with the record.

I for one think that if there was no such thing as a Covid year and Billy was breaking in a new QB last year, he’d still be the Cajuns coach. Even the super Sr thing worked out perfectly for him. It was the perfect storm.

That's part of the reason I stated that we are highly unlikely to have that success again. It was a unique situation to have an entire class of 4 year juniors and 8, or more 5th year seniors return for a season. The circumstances help create the opportunity for a special season.

[ManAboutTown]

If we’re talking about program building, Napier is elite. Hiring coaches, knowing what it takes to win at a national level and recruiting the right players.. he’s elite.

Everything else? I think there is room for improvement. Purely speaking from in-game strategy perspective here: I think losing PT will prove to be a much bigger loss than Napier.