I love what the SBC has done recently and how the script on this conference has been flipped. I think the future is bright.
With that being said, if another conference such as the AAC were to come calling, I think UL has to make the jump strictly for financial reasons.
If my quick google search is correct, each AAC school receives $7 million per year from their tv deal. Each SBC school currently receives $500k per year. That number alone will boost the athletic department significantly. Plus any other conference money there is to be had. As a program that is struggling to put together funds, you have to follow the money in my opinion.
ESPN is losing money hand over fist.
Right now (with no data) I would put the SBC near the top of their current best investments.
Once the AAC loses fee more programs I’m pretty sure the sunbelt will have even more negotiating power. ESPN ain’t going to pay that money if they lose a few more top teams.
stephen a. smith. they recently fired a bunch of "personalities" for cost-cuts, but not him...
I’m somewhat concerned you putting Tulane into this group. Right now and for several years UTSA is a better program by market, fan in attendance, eyes on tv and production on the field. Granted Tulane seems to be getting somewhere, but this comes with an older coach whose had one outstanding year and multiple bad to mediocre years.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)