Page 26 of 49 FirstFirst ... 16 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 36 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 260 of 490

Thread: Conference realignment again????

  1. #251

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by RedTails View Post
    All in all, I'd prefer the SBC stay together. But if that hypothetical scenario would happen, those Big 12 leftovers with us and Louisiana Tech would be cool. I'd almost say Arkansas State, but their non-football sports leave much to be desired.
    Hell no to Tech! Never Tech. Never.

  2. #252

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler View Post
    Hell no to Tech! Never Tech. Never.
    We dont need La Technical Institute!

  3. #253

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoomZoom View Post
    That's some funny ____e!

  4. #254

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    PAC-12 remnants will raid the Big12/MWC.
    ACC remnants will raid Big12/AAC.

    Total effing chaos for everybody else in FBS.

    I reiterate my desires from 30 years ago. UL needs to be in the most competitive, regional conference available. Back then, I hoped that would be the Big12. Today, I still want that, only the conference lineup will be much different.
    Different lineup but better than SBC. Of course, Tulane and the New Orleans market would be our competition for that spot or maybe both of us.

  5. #255

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonCajun View Post
    Different lineup but better than SBC. Of course, Tulane and the New Orleans market would be our competition for that spot or maybe both of us.
    Properly marketed, we should be able to sell that we have better penetration in the NOLA market than Tulane does.

  6. #256

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    I do not want the Techsters in the SBC as long as we are there.


  7. Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by ULGrad@HOU View Post
    I do not want the Techsters in the SBC as long as we are there.
    Awe, bowhooo. Accept the challenge, won the game and quit whining.

  8. Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Quote Originally Posted by ULGrad@HOU View Post
    I do not want the Techsters in the SBC as long as we are there.
    Besides saying we don't have the mental fortitude to schedule for ourselves out of conference, (so put us in a forced to schedule scenario) Tech in the SBC makes zero sense.

  9. Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    Let them rot in C-DOA and maybe get pared in a bowl game…see if they crawfish again.


  10. #260

    Default Re: Conference realignment again????

    There was an interesting Stewart Mandel column today where he laid out scenarios there was more media revenue to be gained with an outright merger of the Big 12/Pac 10. Mandel also stated bump the numbers from 22 to 24 members for easier pod scheduling adding San Diego St. and SMU. He yadda, yadda about SMU being across the metroplex from SMU but that would make 5 Texas schools. Its the longest of long shots, but UL definitely should be letting the Big 12 know of its interest. The mega conference adds a new State. Sure we'd have to wait for years to rake in larger piece of the TV dollars but you do what you have to do to get foot in the door. The east pod of 6 team scenario was Cinn, Iowa St, W. Va, UCF, Kansas, Kansas St., central pod scenario listed was Baylor, Houston, OK St., TCU, Texas Tech, then insert your favorite team here. Granted USF and SMU would be formidable competition to get past for membership. Throw your name in the hat anyway.


Page 26 of 49 FirstFirst ... 16 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 36 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •