I would of expected them to be in the thick of things in the conference race just as they are today. And my expectation was a 39-40 win team. Thats what this team is capable of. And if you look at the games we have gifted away…thats about where we should be. The season rarely goes as you draw it up in Feb, in fact it almost never does. But lets go back to earlier in the season and how that played out. The guys that were used on the mound were the best guys coming out the fall, supposively. Where are they today? We havent seen some of those guys in over a month. Not gonna get into calling out players but they have terribly underachieved. Why? The way Deggs managed the first half of the season was inconsistent to say the least…like he was grasping at straws at times. The pressure to succeed began to mount, but to his credit he calmed the waters. Hes got his guys now, roles have been defined, and has them rolling in a more positive direction. You may take some comments as negative and critical, but its what has taken place.
When a coach says Regional team, my mind goes to high 30s-40 wins. Not saying I’m right. That’s just generally around what it takes. High 30s requires perfection the rest of the way. My thinking heading in to conference was our biggest flaws are self inflicted (walks and errors), so I wasn’t convinced that would taper off just because the competition lessened. To the team’s credit, the defensive numbers have been much better in conference and finding the rotation has curtailed some of the free passes. Only a few games off my expected pace. Those few games have been gut wrenchers.
Not many. Hence the reason i said the season rarely goes as you plan it out in Feb. But rarely do those “guys” ever become irrelevant the rest of a season and are non contributors either. Process that however u want, this team should of been better the first half of the season. As a coach, dont come out yelling this is a regional team and lay an egg.
Good post.
I think the beginning of the season saw more of the analytical approach with the pitching. Guys who had more velo or more spin rate or whatever. And now its settled into guys who get hitters out.
I also think losing Marusak for so much time hindered the team. It’s a 7 man lineup now that Debarge has been dropped down and been relieved of the pressure of a freshman hitting in prime spots in the order for the first 30 or so games. Since being moved down, he’s hitting over .350. I don’t think its a coincidence.
Back to the point, once Max was back, and Debarge got comfortable, it lengthened the lineup to 7 from 5. And its made an enormous difference.
The team is 21-8 with Max in the starting lineup. And was 6-9 when he was out. The 21-8 pace through the current 44 games would have their record at 32-12 and likely close to an at-large lock at this point.
Hopefully they finish strong and make all of it a moot point. I’ve tried all year to keep things in perspective here, and while I have disagreed with many decisions that Coach Deggs has made (and they are his decisions to make so the only ones that matter), but I think his comment about this being a regional team wasn’t far fetched at all, especially without losing Marusak for 15 games.
I also think that if you moved some games around in the schedule, and played some of the tougher opponents later in the year that the perception of this team would have been very different throughout the season.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)