Not researching this again, G-5 teams stringing 10+ win seasons together like UL is rarified air. No problem if the AD is being realistic. I’d say he has a 75% chance of being right.
Not researching this again, G-5 teams stringing 10+ win seasons together like UL is rarified air. No problem if the AD is being realistic. I’d say he has a 75% chance of being right.
If we win 8-9 games and be in the hunt for the Conference Championship, I'd take that almost every year! Expecting 10-11 wins "EVERY" year is unrealistic and just sets you up to be disappointed.
Every one keeps saying 8-9 and I agree with 9. If we have only 8 wins chances are we are not competing for a championship since we will probably have 3 conference loses. With SLU, Eastern Mi, and Rice as 3 of your 4 non conference any thing less than 8 would be a huge drop off. Should win all 3 of those.
Who will be favorite in the west this year? The west should have the same teams as in the past with addition of Troy and So Miss. We definitely have a more favorable side to compete in, we could conceivably lose 3 games to eastern teams and still play in the championship. Boy I bet that would p!$$ some folks off.
https://rumble.com/v1283uc-2OOO-mules-trailer.html
Last edited by KajunKrazy; May 5th, 2022 at 10:34 am. Reason: Could be a different country by then. The truth is coming.
Just wait. The NCAA is considering abolishing the requirement for divisional play in order to have a conference championship FB game. Top two play the CCG.
I would think that would always remain up to the conference. There are some with out divisions that play a championship.
https://rumble.com/v1283uc-2OOO-mules-trailer.html
I just got a chance to listen to the interview today driving back from San Marcos, moving by Fr daughter back.
Dr Maggard gave very detailed answers to the vast majority of the questions. The two that were the most important to me were:
1. The lifting of limits on cost containment by the NCAA. Meaning no limits to schools and/or conferences to fund more coaches, more scholarships, etc. I know it was discussed on this board before, but it really hit home on how really only a dozen or so universities can really compete at that level.
2. RCAF funding. He made it very clear why it is important for RCAF to be beneath the Foundation, but also every dollar given to RCAF and particular sports or causes is designated appropriately and used for that specific purpose.
Around streaming for diamond sports, my reading between the lines is it a money prioritization issue. Dr. Maggard chooses to spend the budgetary dollars in other ways. How do other schools do it and we don't? Maybe they don't have the nutritionists and food budget we have? Maybe they don't have the amount of weight room and training staff we have? Who knows?
I think the streaming fee per season ticket is a very good idea and hopefully one that is brought to his attention.
I would use a smaller fee to kick start content salesmen.
I beliveve a motivated, competent, content sales force can generate far more imcome than broadcasting requires.
Commercials during half innings would go a long way. Could that be part of learfields inventory, I don’t know. Isn’t ESPN supposed to pay us for our content through sunbelt tv deals. I pay a subscription to ESPN+ to be able to watch. Not a fan of tacking on another fee, unless Ticketmaster would start waiving some of there’s.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)