ULtra: Louisiana Athletics Launches New NIL Education and Brand Management Program

[CajunVic]

Bro, you really dont need to be calling people out on grammatical errors when you write faux "PAWS" in your sentence. So, unless one of his pets has prosthetic legs, you may wanna check the spelling on that.

It was intentional. I wanted to see who would poo poo on it. It is appropriate that it would be you.

[CajunT]

Yet, rather than generically respond to the thread, you chose to respond to my post.

As has been pointed out in this thread, Des made mention of this particular issue in January, on Scott's show. What about it was "inside information"?

If something was shared at a luncheon, I really don't see the harm in somebody posting it to this board. But if you don't post something that I don't know about, how should I know to care?

But I think Mullet pretty much summed it up. At the end of the day (and for the matter in the morning and in the afternoon) I'm really not concerned about the "scoop."

Let's be honest...this whole issue started between two particular posters: JMV and Vic.

I really see Vic's side of the argument now.

I've had information shared with me, but I haven't run to the board and started a teaser thread about something I know and (allegedly) nobody else does. I'm flattered these folks have shared this with me, so I would never betray their trust.

Folks have complimented Dr. Maggard on how he keeps things close to the chest, yet some folks seem to have close contact with him. My concern with this isn't that I don't know, my concern is (IMHO) "inside information" can tend to be incomplete, misleading, or simply flat-out wrong; and I think this is detrimental to the program.

Do I frequent this board? Sure, obviously to read about and discuss the Cajuns. I just don't get a chubby because (allegedly) I might know this about this coach, or I might know that about that player.

Sorry, but the only guys I'm really concerned about hearing UL sports from are Jay, Stevie P., Ian, Top, and Bobby.

I tagged your post, it wasn't directed at you. There is a lot to unpack in your post; but rather then wasting my time on who you consider reliable sources or not, you just made my point. I never considered it as inside information and since I listen to very little talk radio in the morning or any other time. I have no idea what was stated on Scott's show.

I had lunch with an RCAF fundraiser in December along with a few other people and he mentioned this was a possibility. I never gave it another thought until recently.

[JMV JustMyView]

Yet, rather than generically respond to the thread, you chose to respond to my post.

As has been pointed out in this thread, Des made mention of this particular issue in January, on Scott's show. What about it was "inside information"?

If something was shared at a luncheon, I really don't see the harm in somebody posting it to this board. But if you don't post something that I don't know about, how should I know to care?

But I think Mullet pretty much summed it up. At the end of the day (and for the matter in the morning and in the afternoon) I'm really not concerned about the "scoop."

Let's be honest...this whole issue started between two particular posters: JMV and Vic.

I really see Vic's side of the argument now.

I've had information shared with me, but I haven't run to the board and started a teaser thread about something I know and (allegedly) nobody else does. I'm flattered these folks have shared this with me, so I would never betray their trust.

Folks have complimented Dr. Maggard on how he keeps things close to the chest, yet some folks seem to have close contact with him. My concern with this isn't that I don't know, my concern is (IMHO) "inside information" can tend to be incomplete, misleading, or simply flat-out wrong; and I think this is detrimental to the program.

Do I frequent this board? Sure, obviously to read about and discuss the Cajuns. I just don't get a chubby because (allegedly) I might know this about this coach, or I might know that about that player.

Sorry, but the only guys I'm really concerned about hearing UL sports from are Jay, Stevie P., Ian, Top, and Bobby.

Just for the record I have no issue with anyone and I haven't seen any posts from that guy in almost 6 months. Nor have I replied back directly to him. You have the wrong guys. Nice try just made yourself look bad.

[JMV JustMyView]

I tagged your post, it wasn't directed at you. There is a lot to unpack in your post; but rather then wasting my time on who you consider reliable sources or not, you just made my point. I never considered it as inside information and since I listen to very little talk radio in the morning or any other time. I have no idea what was stated on Scott's show.

I had lunch with an RCAF fundraiser in December along with a few other people and he mentioned this was a possibility. I never gave it another thought until recently.

That is what I am saying it was a possibility, nothing was a sure deal at that point. appreciate you T

[Cajun Monkee]

I tagged your post, it wasn't directed at you. There is a lot to unpack in your post; but rather then wasting my time on who you consider reliable sources or not, you just made my point. I never considered it as inside information and since I listen to very little talk radio in the morning or any other time. I have no idea what was stated on Scott's show.

I had lunch with an RCAF fundraiser in December along with a few other people and he mentioned this was a possibility. I never gave it another thought until recently.

You said we should attend more luncheons. That seemed to be your point.

I just don't get wooed over being "in the know."

You don't have to waste your time; I'll give you the summarized version...I don't care what the smarks know.

My fears have been, are, and will always be how "inside information", rumors, innuendo, and the like can have a negative affect on our program.

Have a good weekend, my friend. The guys with the information that matters will be broadcasting baseball and softball all weekend long. So we got that going for us.

[JamesTheJeweler]

It was intentional. I wanted to see who would poo poo on it. It is appropriate that it would be you.

LoL! Geezus, what are you, 12? "I DiD iT iNtEnTiOnALLy"
Yeah, sure you did, buddy.....sure you did.

[CajunT]

You said we should attend more luncheons. That seemed to be your point.

I just don't get wooed over being "in the know."

You don't have to waste your time; I'll give you the summarized version...I don't care what the smarks know.

My fears have been, are, and will always be how "inside information", rumors, innuendo, and the like can have a negative affect on our program.

Have a good weekend, my friend. The guys with the information that matters will be broadcasting baseball and softball all weekend long. So we got that going for us.

Yes, I did say that and it was directed at anyone that questions sources. It's not about getting wooed, it's about getting involved. If I pay money into something, I try to get answers from the people responsible for handling those funds, not radio shows. Thanks and Geaux Cajuns!

[Turbine]

I see everybody's side... but its getting tricky with this hexigon.

[JMV JustMyView]

Yes, I did say that and it was directed at anyone that questions sources. It's not about getting wood, it's about getting involved. If I pay money into something, I try to get answers from the people responsible for handling those funds, not radio shows. Thanks and Geaux Cajuns!

If you are getting information from radio guys then you will always be left behind. I agree with you T.

[Turbine]

Don't miss this sentence:

"I just don't get wooed over being "in the know."

No one is getting "left behind"

[CajunVic]

Don't miss this sentence:

"I just don't get wooed over being "in the know."

No one is getting "left behind"

Those who claim to be in the know but never post what they know really know nothing . . .we will let the evidence speak for itself . . .

[ManAboutTown]

Let me say this, and I'm not tacking anyone's position here because this thread is becoming increasingly nauseating. The subject of the NIL was discussed in my conversations with some of the football staff at the Coaches Crawfish Boil. I didn't mention it on RP because to me anything discussed so openly at such an event wasn't insider information. Clearly a number of people in attendance had this information. I can only assume it wasn't shared publicly because the university wasn't ready to make the announcement. To many in this thread, try to attend more of these events if you live locally and you won't need to depend upon anyone's supposed inside information.

Wasn’t able to make it. How was the event?