Doesn't RPI factor in schedule strength and record more or less by default?
Doesn't RPI factor in schedule strength and record more or less by default?
It is interesting (to a few) South Alabama went 1-2 here and RPI went from 62 to 50. UL schedule strength at work, I am guessing? Our RPI went from 79 to 59.
Our schedule strength may help us keep climbing, if we do our part.
After losing at Nichols I was not well. Deggs said the conf season is 30 games, not 3. He is correct.
Again, some look at baseball with a football mentality. And, most of the time, that's what causes "debate" on this board.
Personally, I don't find it appealing when someone makes a judgment about a player or game based on the first inning. It would be great if we'd let the game unfold a bit before criticizing. But I know that's not going to happen.
I can confirm Jack Clark is no longer with the program.
No Turbine. We were ranked #1 in all polls at the conclusion of the conference tournaments. Collegiate Baseball was the only one that ranked us #1 prior to the conclusion of the conference tournaments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_N.eball_rankings
I should have stopped typing after RPI
https://forumeus.com/showthread.php/.915#post666915
Slight jump in RPI to 53 after the win last night. Keep winning
LR, like us, had an opportunity to bring home a big RPI win for the conference last night in Fayetteville. It was 6-2 in the 5th. Arkansas stormed back with some guerrilla ball and ended up scoring like 15 unanswered runs. Bummer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)