I think all here would be happy to hear the opposing viewpoint, I think that's what we were doing when we listened to Scott's interview. I would also suggest that just about everybody here had been very complimentary of Dr. Maggard in his time here and his leadership. I think we were all listening to get that opposing view but instead, the interview was honestly a poor show by Dr. Maggard and either lied or misspoke about a very critical issue that was supposed to be a big reason for their decision. I'd be happy to debate you or any other person who is in favor of the decision.
Which is why I believe it is completely rational to criticize Dr. Maggard due to the reasons you mention in this post. What I'm not sure we're doing is are we just putting all our eggs in the basket for next year or are we trying to actually build a program? We can go down the rabbit hole of what if's in regards to what happens if they have a great year next year and Marlin's future but I want to know what the end game is.
The end game is we will play basketball next year with The Big Fish as head coach and see how it goes.
There is no doubt Maggard had it 75% covered . . .
Your question is my concern going forward and why I don't agree with the decision to keep Marlin another year. I believe it's motivated by money and not using RCAF dollars to buy a coach out. In fact that is exactly what two RCAF Board members privately stated to several others and myself a week before Dr. Maggard's press release.
If he is selling that Coach Marlin is more likely to win next season than a new coach with the returning roster of athletes and several like Brown decide to play pro basketball then the season will likely implode anyway. To me this decision is just kicking the can down the road and hoping that Coach Marlin is going to catch fire and justify their decision.
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)