true. but if it werent up to them, if there was some objective body in charge of the rules, in theory, maybe others could expound on the idea?
i had a similar idea in basketball a long time ago, that with rounding obviously, why not make the player’s gpa the amount they get for each bucket in basketball. A 4.0 student’s goals are worth more than the 2.0 minimum eligible player, etc etc. how far would teams be willing to sacrifice overall talent for smarter players, where do you find the perfect mix, seems like it would add another level of strategy to the sport.