Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 57

Thread: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

  1. #41

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    Other than Jorge Munoz, every single coach currently on the staff under Coach Desormeaux was hired by Billy Napier. Lamar Morgan was hired in 2019 and later left the program for Houston. So, if you trusted this staff under Billy Napier that won 13 games this past season, why not trust them now?
    Bravo!!!!!! +10,000!!!!

  2. #42

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    I will never…..EVER give up my allegiance to this Team. This school. This Nation.


  3. #43

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    I hear you brother
    Been “not giving up” (more often than nought -banging my head against the wall) regarding this team for over 40 years now.
    I pray this NIL and transfer portal crap can be contained -AT LEAST return to sitting out a year


  4. #44

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    For the sake of our fellow G5s


  5. #45

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Quote Originally Posted by KajunKrazy View Post
    Just told a friend of mine on the phone I predict Des will be a better play caller than his predecessor was.
    He's definitely more aggressive and I like that.

  6. #46

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Quote Originally Posted by tdncz View Post
    I hear you brother
    Been “not giving up” (more often than nought -banging my head against the wall) regarding this team for over 40 years now.
    I pray this NIL and transfer portal crap can be contained -AT LEAST return to sitting out a year
    That has to happen. Otherwise, you can't contain it.

  7. #47

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Guys. I have been talking with CFB enthusiasts about this for 4-5 years now. Forget the 130 teams in CFP division. Forget the 66 teams considered P-5 (that includes ND and BYU). The world of college only props 20-22 teams as the “Big Boys”. Soon even some of the mid level and doormat P-5s will be treated the same as JC/CC 2yr pathways to the large schools with more money and more avenues to NIL.

    - USC, UCLA, Washington
    - Notre Dame
    - MSU, Mich., OHST, PSU, Neb.
    - Clemson, Pitt, FSU, Miami
    - Bama, UGA, FLa, Auburn, Ole Miss, ARK, TAMU, LSU, OU, Texas

    UW is a maybe on this list. Also, look which conference has the most teams. This is how the leverage will shift. Players will park at Arizona for 2 years until the players transfer out or draft up, then AZ will transfer to USC for more glitz and glamour. Sure AZ will retool with players from other low P-5s and G-5s, but give it a free years. Every other team not in the ones I listed above, will be irrelevant and have as much of a chance at CFP as we do. JMO


  8. Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantvb View Post
    Guys. I have been talking with CFB enthusiasts about this for 4-5 years now. Forget the 130 teams in CFP division. Forget the 66 teams considered P-5 (that includes ND and BYU). The world of college only props 20-22 teams as the “Big Boys”. Soon even some of the mid level and doormat P-5s will be treated the same as JC/CC 2yr pathways to the large schools with more money and more avenues to NIL.

    - USC, UCLA, Washington
    - Notre Dame
    - MSU, Mich., OHST, PSU, Neb.
    - Clemson, Pitt, FSU, Miami
    - Bama, UGA, FLa, Auburn, Ole Miss, ARK, TAMU, LSU, OU, Texas

    UW is a maybe on this list. Also, look which conference has the most teams. This is how the leverage will shift. Players will park at Arizona for 2 years until the players transfer out or draft up, then AZ will transfer to USC for more glitz and glamour. Sure AZ will retool with players from other low P-5s and G-5s, but give it a free years. Every other team not in the ones I listed above, will be irrelevant and have as much of a chance at CFP as we do. JMO
    I believe many on RP have penned similar views.

  9. #49

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantvb View Post
    Guys. I have been talking with CFB enthusiasts about this for 4-5 years now. Forget the 130 teams in CFP division. Forget the 66 teams considered P-5 (that includes ND and BYU). The world of college only props 20-22 teams as the “Big Boys”. Soon even some of the mid level and doormat P-5s will be treated the same as JC/CC 2yr pathways to the large schools with more money and more avenues to NIL.

    - USC, UCLA, Washington
    - Notre Dame
    - MSU, Mich., OHST, PSU, Neb.
    - Clemson, Pitt, FSU, Miami
    - Bama, UGA, FLa, Auburn, Ole Miss, ARK, TAMU, LSU, OU, Texas

    UW is a maybe on this list. Also, look which conference has the most teams. This is how the leverage will shift. Players will park at Arizona for 2 years until the players transfer out or draft up, then AZ will transfer to USC for more glitz and glamour. Sure AZ will retool with players from other low P-5s and G-5s, but give it a free years. Every other team not in the ones I listed above, will be irrelevant and have as much of a chance at CFP as we do. JMO
    Let the top 20 P5 teams leave the NCAA really dont matter to me. We can have a dam fun league without them

  10. #50

    Default Re: Michael Desormeaux addresses UL transfer portal losses and tweets

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Malkinson View Post
    Let the top 20 P5 teams leave the NCAA really dont matter to me. We can have a dam fun league without them
    I don't think that will happen. I could be wrong, but I don't think CFB would be nearly as popular, which means attendance and especially TV viewership would decline, which means the big boys' income would drop drastically.

    In addition, long time conference membership would have to be drastically revised. much more than anything we've seen to date.

    With people like Saban and Kirby stating that limitations need to be set, I believe NIL and portal will be curtailed. these guys are literally at the top of the top. If they think this is not a good situation, I can't imagine anyone thinking it is.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. KLFY: One on One with Michael Desormeaux
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 28th, 2021, 06:12 pm
  2. PRIME: Michael Desormeaux
    By Oldman in forum Football
    Replies: 419
    Last Post: December 8th, 2021, 01:53 pm
  3. 5 things Michael Desormeaux must do right away
    By NewsCopy in forum Louisiana Athletics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 7th, 2021, 09:58 pm
  4. Tulsa WR tweets a transfer to Louisiana
    By NewsCopy in forum PlayerDock
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 6th, 2012, 09:54 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •