There’s got to be a way that the SBC is going to seed teams that have the same number of cancelled games. I suspect if you’re the canceler your seed is worse than the victim team. It could get very nutty if you more teams with the same issues in a round robin type canceler victim.
The way I read the statement from the Sunbelt is the threshold is playing 80% of games scheduled, which would mean the 4th cancelled game takes you below the threshold. Teams above the threshold would be seeded by winning % and then teams below the threshold would seeded below them based on winning %. If someone knows more feel free to correct me. Of course this may be soon revised because as of now Texas St. and Georgia St are already on the cusp of falling below with 1 more cancellation.
Jay, can you elaborate on this policy? I am a little confused as to the seeding rules. I also think it would be very unfair if a team could not play enough games to be seeded properly if all of their cancellations were due to the scheduled opponents not being able to play. Not sure if an allowance is made for that circumstance.
I went back and read it again and Jay is correct in it is 80% of the games played. The way I interpret that is they will take the total number of conference games played and divide by 12 for an average number per team. If an individual team has played less than 80% of that average then they fall below the threshold. This system makes it much tougher for a team to fall below.
There are currently 35 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 35 guests)