Maintaining Success

[CajunVic]

34 "posts" is far different from the 35 "posters" you posited earlier.

30 posts could be ONE person posting twice a minute "in-game" which by the way is a ratio you yourself have exceeded in short stints.

Find that . . . Another poster shooting from the hip . . . With assumptions . . . We all know about assumptions . . . Ass u me . . .

[ULGrad@HOU]

Only one poster on this site personally attacks posters and never sticks to the subject or adds relevant information. I am hoping you are correct that it will get better in 2022. I am thinking about taking all members that I have on ignore off of ignore, but not if this childish BS keeps happening.

Actually, you have attacked me before, but no worries, that was soon to be last year.

[Turbine]

... it was never going to be the Nunez- Lewis trade off like Billy’s first season.

Absolutely correct. No way.

And definitly not in tight games.

Still it is clearly obvious Napier had zero interest in developing next year's starter. Not even from a calm your future nerves standpoint.

I do love love how, Napier had real plays scripted for the emergency one play substitutions.

[CajunVic]

Absolutely correct. No way.

And definitly not in tight games.

Still it is clearly obvious Napier had zero interest in developing next year's starter. Not even from a calm your future nerves standpoint.

I do love love how, Napier had real plays scripted for the emergency one play substitutions.

Or maybe Fields just went in and executed the next play intended for Levi . . . He might be that good . . .

[Turbine]

... if y’ll want to continue on Levi after what he has contributed to this university, you can’t be saved . . .

Not one person is going after Levi.

Once again you deflect.

[Turbine]

Or maybe Fields just went in and executed the next play intended for Levi . . . He might be that good . . .

Definitly a possibility, but Napier was more prepared than that. He had scenarios scripted for every situation.

[JMV JustMyView]

Actually, you have attacked me before, but no worries, that was soon to be last year.

I attacked you over and over again?

[ULGrad@HOU]

I attacked you over and over again?

This is not a big deal. No, not over and over. Just once that I recall. On your comment about it being 1 person doing the attacking, I would agree it's mostly one, but several, maybe about 6 or 7 others do it also.

[JMV JustMyView]

This is not a big deal. No, not over and over. Just once that I recall. On your comment about it being 1 person doing the attacking, I would agree it's mostly one, but several, maybe about 6 or 7 others do it also.

Actually what I said was: Only one poster on this site personally attacks posters, never sticks to the subject, or adds relevant information. 6 or 7 others don't do all 3 things that I said, only one does. I added that poster to the ignore list almost 3 months ago and haven't looked back. He has responded back to me probably 500 times versus 0 responses from me. Luckily I can't see what he says. Happy New Years and Geaux Cajuns!

[CajunVic]

I attacked you over and over again?

Dude, ever since I made an observation about 2 1/2 years ago that you were not the only Cajun fan that knew anything about softball, about 3/4’s of your post since then have been attacking me. It has gotten so bad at times that you have even started attacking an athlete that you think is my kid. So yes, there is only one person on this board that does most of the attacking and it’s you . . .