He could have done both
Good leaders should seek the best options, plans, and strategy -without regard to ego or whose ideas they might have been.
He was one dimensional -would not listen to those who tried to explain that BOTH were possible -and to improve both was the best way forward for his academic goals.
I had the opportunity to spend a half dozen afternoons with Authement at football practice.
The deepest discussion we ever had was who owned the Cajundome.
UL owning the Cajun Dome is like vacations at your Gulf Shores beach house on the Gulf side. You always take it in February because you can’t afford it, and rent it out for summer and holidays.
I know as a former athlete your perspective was that he was hostile towards athletics. I think that is the wrong word. He viewed athletics as a side note to the University. He wasn't out to kill it but didn't view it as an investment either.
As far as fund raising.... I dealt with this first hand and it wasn't just athletics. It was absolutely insane how he and he alone approved or more often than not disapproved anyone associated with the University from seeking donations of any type. If there is anyone out there that ever had the conversation with him as to why I haven't heard it and I've talked to a lot of people through the years that experienced similar. Bottom line was that you better not seek any external funding sources without his explicit approval no matter if it was athletics or not.
Truer words ^^were never spoken.
The general subject of RA may be similar to LL over here. Mind made up no matter the angle . . .
I agree with CajunRunner. Vobserver had to raise money on his own just to get new hurdles purchased. About 15 years ago the head track coach at UL was making around $25K a year. C4L also qualified for the Ncaa's and the school couldn't/didn't pay for him to represent the school. Vobserver had to front the money.
My man!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)