Page 13 of 18 FirstFirst ... 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 145 to 156 of 205

Thread: I 100% Support Mike Desormeaux! (formerly I will not support Mike D)

  1. #145

    Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    I understand it may be an unpopular opinion. I have always said there is a bigger problem of balancing the need to spend to have success with the need to be fiscally responsible. It may scream small-time, but money isnt an infinite resource for this program.

    We had a $5.9 million from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 (one season affected by COVID); and $4.5 million deficit from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The numbers for July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, havent been released, but considering both academic semesters were affected by COVID, i would imagine there will be a deficit.

    I like Maggard. But odds are he wont be here in five years. What incentive is there to be fiscally responsible? Is Des worth $775,000, or more like $500k? Does $250k make that much of a difference in the grand scheme of things? I think so.

    By no means am I big donor. But I do want to see my money used responsibly. Napier was worth $2 million because he proved his worth before getting here and in his first few years. He was also worth it because of basic market factors--i.e. he could make a heck of a lot more somewhere else.

    Compare that to Des. No HC experience. One year (or two?) of co-OC position. Six years NCAA coaching. Young. Local. Thats all Im saying.


  2. Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisianaB View Post
    $775k more than all SBC HCs except Spavitol, Butch Jones, and Chadwell.

    Just don’t think 775k is justified considering he has no HC experience, and he would have taken a lot less. Market factors didn’t determine this salary.
    He has HC experience, you don’t know he would have taken less and absolutely market factors determined his salary . . . This is the University of Louisiana, SBC champs and top 25 team . . .

  3. Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    If you were going to pay Lanning $775k, you need to pay Mike $775. Plain and simple. The number matters in so many ways.


  4. Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisianaB View Post
    I understand it may be an unpopular opinion. I have always said there is a bigger problem of balancing the need to spend to have success with the need to be fiscally responsible. It may scream small-time, but money isnt an infinite resource for this program.

    We had a $5.9 million from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 (one season affected by COVID); and $4.5 million deficit from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The numbers for July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, havent been released, but considering both academic semesters were affected by COVID, i would imagine there will be a deficit.

    I like Maggard. But odds are he wont be here in five years. What incentive is there to be fiscally responsible? Is Des worth $775,000, or more like $500k? Does $250k make that much of a difference in the grand scheme of things? I think so.

    By no means am I big donor. But I do want to see my money used responsibly. Napier was worth $2 million because he proved his worth before getting here and in his first few years. He was also worth it because of basic market factors--i.e. he could make a heck of a lot more somewhere else.

    Compare that to Des. No HC experience. One year (or two?) of co-OC position. Six years NCAA coaching. Young. Local. Thats all Im saying.
    So, do you think Maggard’s raising the salaries of almost every coach that was already here and not going to ever leave shortly after he got here was not warranted . . . guys like you want us to abuse the very people who are good loyal and willing to be here. That is USL’ing things.

  5. #149

    Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisianaB View Post
    I understand it may be an unpopular opinion. I have always said there is a bigger problem of balancing the need to spend to have success with the need to be fiscally responsible. It may scream small-time, but money isnt an infinite resource for this program.

    We had a $5.9 million from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 (one season affected by COVID); and $4.5 million deficit from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The numbers for July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, havent been released, but considering both academic semesters were affected by COVID, i would imagine there will be a deficit.

    I like Maggard. But odds are he wont be here in five years. What incentive is there to be fiscally responsible? Is Des worth $775,000, or more like $500k? Does $250k make that much of a difference in the grand scheme of things? I think so.

    By no means am I big donor. But I do want to see my money used responsibly. Napier was worth $2 million because he proved his worth before getting here and in his first few years. He was also worth it because of basic market factors--i.e. he could make a heck of a lot more somewhere else.

    Compare that to Des. No HC experience. One year (or two?) of co-OC position. Six years NCAA coaching. Young. Local. Thats all Im saying.
    Sean McVay became an NFL HC at 30 years old. Sometimes guys just have "IT" and smart decision makers notice it early. We all hope that's the case here.

  6. #150

    Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunVic View Post
    So, do you think Maggard’s raising the salaries of almost every coach that was already here and not going to ever leave shortly after he got here was not warranted . . . guys like you want us to abuse the very people who are good loyal and willing to be here. That is USL’ing things.
    I don’t think $500k is abuse. I think it’s responsible. He does not have college coaching experience. College and high school are a little different.

    He wins next year, I’m all for bumping up.

    Do you agree with anything I said or is it a blanket rebuke?

  7. Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    If contracts were worth the digital ink they were written in, this contract would be a steal.

    I would consider it front loaded with highway robbery on the back end, but we know how these things work. If he is successful it will have been extended and bumped 3 times by the current end date.


  8. #152

    Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisianaB View Post
    I understand it may be an unpopular opinion. I have always said there is a bigger problem of balancing the need to spend to have success with the need to be fiscally responsible. It may scream small-time, but money isnt an infinite resource for this program.

    We had a $5.9 million from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 (one season affected by COVID); and $4.5 million deficit from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The numbers for July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, havent been released, but considering both academic semesters were affected by COVID, i would imagine there will be a deficit.

    I like Maggard. But odds are he wont be here in five years. What incentive is there to be fiscally responsible? Is Des worth $775,000, or more like $500k? Does $250k make that much of a difference in the grand scheme of things? I think so.

    By no means am I big donor. But I do want to see my money used responsibly. Napier was worth $2 million because he proved his worth before getting here and in his first few years. He was also worth it because of basic market factors--i.e. he could make a heck of a lot more somewhere else.

    Compare that to Des. No HC experience. One year (or two?) of co-OC position. Six years NCAA coaching. Young. Local. Thats all Im saying.
    Mike tapped ya ole lady in college or something? Quit hatin bruh.

  9. #153

    Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Mike tapped ya ole lady in college or something? Quit hatin bruh.
    If that’s all you gotta say in response then there’s no point in providing an actual response. Grownups can discuss these things

  10. Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    I was hoping for UL to save a little more than $1.25 mil over last year, but I'm happy for the Desormeaux family.
    You are shorting that analysis by $3mm

  11. Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisianaB View Post
    If that’s all you gotta say in response then there’s no point in providing an actual response. Grownups can discuss these things
    Still looking for one of those grownups on the cheese side and you, my friend, are not one of them . . . The response to your whine was most appropriate . . .

  12. #156

    Default Re: I will not support Mike D

    Quote Originally Posted by LouisianaB View Post
    If that’s all you gotta say in response then there’s no point in providing an actual response. Grownups can discuss these things
    “We are serious at the university of Louisiana, we are committed to be the top G5 program in the country and we found the guy to do it” well then why you paying him 8th highest salary in the SBC? Oh well he didn’t have any other options. Bet that Sounds fantastic out on the recruiting trail

Page 13 of 18 FirstFirst ... 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 19 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 19 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Head Coach Mike Desormeaux
    By CajunT in forum Football
    Replies: 484
    Last Post: September 25th, 2022, 06:22 am
  2. Mike Desormeaux for Louisiana Head Coach
    By CajunVic in forum Football
    Replies: 665
    Last Post: December 19th, 2021, 11:57 am
  3. Blaine Gautier and Mike Desormeaux
    By tdncz in forum Football
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: December 10th, 2021, 06:51 pm
  4. Fellow UL coaches react to the Mike Desormeaux hire
    By NewsCopy in forum Coaching Matters
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: December 7th, 2021, 03:24 pm
  5. Replies: 31
    Last Post: November 25th, 2013, 12:13 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •