I trust Dr. Maggard on this hire, but it is a bit of a head scratcher and a gamble.
I'll say this, if it does work out and CMD can successfully continue the cULture and process we may have a stable coaching situation for 10+ years.
I trust Dr. Maggard on this hire, but it is a bit of a head scratcher and a gamble.
I'll say this, if it does work out and CMD can successfully continue the cULture and process we may have a stable coaching situation for 10+ years.
I read a espn article that Dan Lanning was interviewed if that is true..... we USLed the ____ out of this
Thank you Jay agree with you a 100% percent like I stated on here yesterday. Dr Maggard has made nothing but great hires since he has been here and Dr Maggard is not trying to fix anything with this hire but to take it even further. Also with Coach Mike you have someone who played at UL and was the only coach Napier retained off coach hud staff and was recommended for this job by coach Napier. This will be a fantastic hire and will support coach Mike 100%
All of you people need to chill out. We are all 100% invested in Mike being successful as head coach of our Louisiana Ragin Cajuns. The fact that some of us have legitimate concerns about his readiness for the job does not equate to us "hating" him or even the hire. I have not seen one person here express doubt about Mike's character or work ethic or commitment to the job at hand. What I have seen are concerns very similar to those which a proud parent might have were their beloved child to receive a sudden and unexpected promotion to a position at work.
Every on of us wants him to succeed. We all want him to be as good as or better than his coaching parent CBN. Some of us are mothers who can see no wrong in their offspring; others are fathers who believe wholeheartedly that he CAN do the job, but see the possibility that he might have needed more time and experience to fully equip himself to handle it.
None of us are wrong.
Ultimately Maggard does not make the Hire T-Joe does. What If this was a cost saving measure to help balance the budget. If the contract comes out with him making 600k a year I will be very very worried. Pivot off this Napier gave his recommendation for Dez because he wanted Tony in Florida with him and not the HC here?
I said all along I was happy with whomever Dr. Maggard chose.
To add to that, he was the recommendation by Coach Napier and this is a great continuation of the cULture that has been put into place over the last four years.
As usual, there are many "green grass posters on here. I am surprised at the hire BUT am all in! I am only surprised because I don't know Mike's ability first hand, the same as everyone else on this board. But who does, oh right, the ones in charge.
GEAUX CAJUNS!
Yep. It's ok to have questions and/or concerns. It is NOT ok to judge this before he's coached his first game.
I disagree with "none of us are wrong." I think those who have already decided "we USL'd this one" are dead wrong.
Now as far as salary is concerned, Billy's original salary was 750 plus incentives. He earned the raises he got. I would expect Mike's salary to be somewhere in that range, give or take 100K.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)