Everybody knows we do Tweeter here, not Twitter . . . all will be fine once things settle down . . .
Can we put the baseball & big game hunting/big splash talk in the closet. It gives me the wooleys when I know what's about to happen not too far from here with new trophy coach. Besides, there's no such thing as a home run coach without homerun assistants. So all of that talk means didley pooh. My question is what kind of resources & help is Mike going to get to help him get those guys that will make him a home run hire & not an infield fly. Could it be a great hire? It could be the greatest UL hire ever. But it could also be train wreck without the proper support personnel who buy into Mike's system. It's the most important hire in the history of the Louisiana athletic department. That is not debatable.
Think about it. Napier’s considered a top 20-30 coach in the country. So we expect to replace him with better at UL. Let be real. As good as we’ve been we still aren’t a top 50 job.
Mike D is the man for the job. Wait and see.
Why aren’t we a top 50 job? We’ve finished in the top 25 two years running, and our coach just got poached by one the elite programs.
Saying this isn’t a job young and hungry coaches wouldn’t fight for is simply incorrect.
The issue here is…Did Maggard hire to Des to keep everything together or because he was the best candidate?
There’s always going to be more than one way to skin a cat. Napier’s way worked, but will it always work? College football evolves at break neck speed.
I want to be dead wrong, but this hire reeks of being too scared to roll the dice and start over from scratch. I’d rather not be the program that tries to repeat what worked in the past while every other program is moving forward trying to find the next big thing.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)