Louisiana Football Coaching Search

[JMV JustMyView]

1. What is Mikes plan? We dont really know it. And since he has only been at UL, we should ASSUME it is confined by his only UL-experience.
2. The one he will lay out to Maggard? Are you SURE he will get an interview?

With all that sai, I LOVE MD. I pray he spreads his wings, and returns to be our HC right after our next HC gets hired as a top tier P5 coach in 3-4 years.
As I said earlier, we should be competing with mid tier P5s for our next HC. MD is not in that competition YET.
Just my opinion

Mike will get an interview. From my sources he is being pushed heavily internally and has the backing of the current staff. In no way am I saying he will get the job. A whole lot of good coaches have applied.

[CajunVic]

Mike will get an interview. From my sources he is being pushed heavily internally and has the backing of the current staff. In no way am I saying he will get the job. A whole lot of good coaches have applied.

Look at this guy . . . read something from Vic and pawning if off as his own in another thread . . . pretty funny here . . .

[tdncz]

NO it wouldn't.

Mike checks all the boxes that Dr. Maggard is looking for.

And, Dr. Maggard will make the right decision as he ALWAYS has when it comes to coaches.

I have no idea if Mike is the guy.....but if he is, all the USLing is in your head. Dr. Maggard didn't suddenly become stupid.

As I said, "just my opinion," and since NO ONE can predict the future (although several claim to be able to do so on this board), of course it is "all in my head."
I think the term "USLing it" means we hire coaches like we did in the past - ie looking for a bargain without looking at the whole picture.
As I said, IN MY OPINION , MD is not ready.
Look, I hire/fire people several times per month, I deal in RISK MANAGEMENT.
When someone come in and applies for a job, I perform a risk analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with a certain pedigree is outweighed by other substantive, tangible facts of the applicants resume and interview. I am POSITIVE Maggard is not "stupid" and would perform a similar (if not better) Risk Analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with MD's CURRENT PEDIGREE is outweighed by 1. other applicants who have applied (and with deeper pedigrees - thus less risk) and 2. the HOPEFUL chance that his "unknowns" will end up all on the positive side.

[CajunVic]

As I said, "just my opinion," and since NO ONE can predict the future (although several claim to be able to do so on this board), of course it is "all in my head."
I think the term "USLing it" means we hire coaches like we did in the past - ie looking for a bargain without looking at the whole picture.
As I said, IN MY OPINION , MD is not ready.
Look, I hire/fire people several times per month, I deal in RISK MANAGEMENT.
When someone come in and applies for a job, I am POSITIVE Maggard is not "stupid" does and would perform a similar Risk Analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with MD's CURRENT PEDIGREE is outweighed by 1. other applicants who have applied (and with deeper pedigrees - thus less risk) and 2. the HOPEFUL chance that his "unknowns" will end up all on the positive side.

How about the unknowns of every other coach in the search, the major one being how they would fit into the cULture that has been built here with Napier . . . how about that unknown . . . it is pretty much not an unknown with CMD . . .

[JMV JustMyView]

As I said, "just my opinion," and since NO ONE can predict the future (although several claim to be able to do so on this board), of course it is "all in my head."
I think the term "USLing it" means we hire coaches like we did in the past - ie looking for a bargain without looking at the whole picture.
As I said, IN MY OPINION , MD is not ready.
Look, I hire/fire people several times per month, I deal in RISK MANAGEMENT.
When someone come in and applies for a job, I perform a risk analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with a certain pedigree is outweighed by other substantive, tangible facts of the applicants resume and interview. I am POSITIVE Maggard is not "stupid" and would perform a similar (if not better) Risk Analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with MD's CURRENT PEDIGREE is outweighed by 1. other applicants who have applied (and with deeper pedigrees - thus less risk) and 2. the HOPEFUL chance that his "unknowns" will end up all on the positive side.

Great post.

[CajunEXPRESS]

As I said, "just my opinion," and since NO ONE can predict the future (although several claim to be able to do so on this board), of course it is "all in my head."
I think the term "USLing it" means we hire coaches like we did in the past - ie looking for a bargain without looking at the whole picture.
As I said, IN MY OPINION , MD is not ready.
Look, I hire/fire people several times per month, I deal in RISK MANAGEMENT.
When someone come in and applies for a job, I perform a risk analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with a certain pedigree is outweighed by other substantive, tangible facts of the applicants resume and interview. I am POSITIVE Maggard is not "stupid" and would perform a similar (if not better) Risk Analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with MD's CURRENT PEDIGREE is outweighed by 1. other applicants who have applied (and with deeper pedigrees - thus less risk) and 2. the HOPEFUL chance that his "unknowns" will end up all on the positive side.

There’s one thing CMD has over everyone else. Maggard knows him better than any of the other candidates. That’s huge. He’s just got to be sure familiarity isn’t clouding objective judgement.

[CajunNation]

As I said, "just my opinion," and since NO ONE can predict the future (although several claim to be able to do so on this board), of course it is "all in my head."
I think the term "USLing it" means we hire coaches like we did in the past - ie looking for a bargain without looking at the whole picture.
As I said, IN MY OPINION , MD is not ready.
Look, I hire/fire people several times per month, I deal in RISK MANAGEMENT.
When someone come in and applies for a job, I perform a risk analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with a certain pedigree is outweighed by other substantive, tangible facts of the applicants resume and interview. I am POSITIVE Maggard is not "stupid" and would perform a similar (if not better) Risk Analysis to determine whether the risk of hiring someone with MD's CURRENT PEDIGREE is outweighed by 1. other applicants who have applied (and with deeper pedigrees - thus less risk) and 2. the HOPEFUL chance that his "unknowns" will end up all on the positive side.

..and if the AD chooses CMD because he can save a little money, it would be usling it. If the AD chooses CMD beacuase it is best for the cULture and pays him accordingly, I would be CMD's biggest defender, after Charliek of course.

[CajunVic]

..and if the AD chooses CMD because he can save a little money, it would be usling it. If the AD chooses CMD beacuase it is best for the cULture and pays him accordingly, I would be CMD's biggest defender, after Charliek of course.

When getting the best candidate available at a good price is in the picture, why wouldn't the best AD in the country jump on that hire . . . like, if he chooses MD AND it saves money . . . why not . . .

[CharlieK]

..and if the AD chooses CMD because he can save a little money, it would be usling it. If the AD chooses CMD beacuase it is best for the cULture and pays him accordingly, I would be CMD's biggest defender, after Charliek of course.

Huh? I've said already a few times I don't think he's ready for this slot.

I'll support him or whoever Maggard chooses.

I'll go to my grave thinking he had the best ball fake I've ever seen, though.

[CrazyCajun]

1. What is Mikes plan? We dont really know it. And since he has only been at UL, we should ASSUME it is confined by his only UL-experience.
2. The one he will lay out to Maggard? Are you SURE he will get an interview?

With all that sai, I LOVE MD. I pray he spreads his wings, and returns to be our HC right after our next HC gets hired as a top tier P5 coach in 3-4 years.
As I said earlier, we should be competing with mid tier P5s for our next HC. MD is not in that competition YET.
Just my opinion

Exactly, none of us know. If mike is the guy, you know what would be USL’ng it? Not hiring him just bc he is mike. Everybody “trusts maggard” unless he hires someone they don’t agree with.

[tdncz]

Re-read everyone:
I said: USLing it is "looking for a bargain WITHOUT looking at the whole picture."
Aint nuttin wrong with getting a bargain SO LONG AS THE BARGAIN GETTER IS "LOOKING AT THE WHOLE PICTURE!"

[Boomer]

I don’t see it being Des. I like him a lot, but I don’t think we promote the TE’s coach after our best season in school history.

...OR…..MAYBE THAT IS the reason you promote him! He and Nap were QBs, both coached receivers, and remember Nap as an OC at a young age!