A lot of larger schools either play the home & home or send a check to basically buy out the game. Usually, the smaller school will leverage the funds to purchase another home game.
A lot of larger schools either play the home & home or send a check to basically buy out the game. Usually, the smaller school will leverage the funds to purchase another home game.
So, basically, if this were in place, Napier would obligated to put in his contract with Florida that it would have a home and home, or he would breach his contract with Louisiana... is that correct? In this type of situation, is there a penalty in the coaches contract with his current school if he doesn't require it in his contract with his new school?
The new school can say nix on the hire. It’s part of the new coaches agreement with his future employer.
Either way, if there is a penalty, he would be liable for the penalty, if there is no penalty he would be liable for contractual damages, which could be a huge number. I would think if he has that, either his new employer agrees or he negotiates a buyout of that provision with us as part of the negotiating process.
There is no way that happens
As a season ticket holder to both sports (and baseball) I agree with this to a certain extent. However, I don't think it should be the football programs responsibility to fix the basketball program! But if that is what it takes to get the basketball program even just back to average, I would support it.
A couple of million helps with the stadium overhaul.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul has always been a no, no, however his name is Bob . . .
The little thang that "reads" sports news between segments on The Lame this am mentioned the buyout was 30M. That was on the RPEE3 show...
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)