Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 13 to 18 of 18

Thread: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

  1. Default Re: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Malkinson View Post
    I don't think the money will be the reason Napier stays or leaves. He wants to win Nattys
    One day, when he leaves, people here will give in and face that this is really the paramount factor in what his decision may be. If he feels that staying here now and not jumping on whatever is out there now it will be because, in HIS mind, the process has a better likelihood of happening at this time by staying and waiting for something else to develop. All the other things discussed here are mere red herrings in the process.

  2. Default Re: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

    Quote Originally Posted by DieHard 1280 View Post
    No way in ______

    Liberty has an advantage in that regard to almost every G5 team in the country.
    But only CUSA and Judy would let them into their conference and immediately put every other member at a disadvantage up close and personal.

  3. #15

    Default Re: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoomZoom View Post
    But only CUSA and Judy would let them into their conference and immediately put every other member at a disadvantage up close and personal.
    You say that as if they had a choice. If Liberty didn’t join MT & WKU would have surely bolted.

    So it was either Liberty, MT, & WKU, or McNeese, Lamar, and Incarnate Word.

  4. Default Re: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRebel View Post
    You say that as if they had a choice. If Liberty didn’t join MT & WKU would have surely bolted.

    So it was either Liberty, MT, & WKU, or McNeese, Lamar, and Incarnate Word.
    So it came down to “I’ll take sell my soul for 200, Alex” instead of “I’ll take Moe, Larry and Curley from the SLC for 50 cents, Alex”.

  5. #17

    Default Re: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

    Quote Originally Posted by UL_Cajuns View Post
    10 year deals seem to be keeping these coaches. You know Dr Maggard will at least try this before Napier goes. Not sure if we can afford 4 million a year(Jesus money) though.

    If Napier goes, Dr Maggard should be congratulated in finding this great coach. Not FL, LSU, or VT.
    Freeze is damaged goods. He is in the "Scratches and dent" section. He is perfect for the job he has. I don't believe the SEC schools would take a chance on him again. Good on him for a pretty nice rehab.

  6. Default Re: Liberty to pay Freeze $4m annually

    Quote Originally Posted by UL_Cajuns View Post
    10 year deals seem to be keeping these coaches. You know Dr Maggard will at least try this before Napier goes. Not sure if we can afford 4 million a year(Jesus money) though.

    If Napier goes, Dr Maggard should be congratulated in finding this great coach. Not FL, LSU, or VT.
    The ten year contracts are for the coaches not the universities. My first recollection of a ten year deal was Tim Floyd at LSUNO. I knew then it wasn’t actually to keep Tim there as to guarantee a lifetime of higher income. He left for Iowa State a couple years later. The ten years never keeps them from getting a better gig.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Podcast: Liberty HC Hugh Freeze (Louisiana preview)
    By IdahoCajun in forum RECORDED it
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 17th, 2021, 07:38 am
  2. Ole Miss Lands Freeze
    By anhil8tor in forum Coaching Matters
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: December 5th, 2011, 02:37 pm
  3. Hiring freeze jolts UL
    By NewsCopy in forum Up On LA
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 29th, 2008, 01:44 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •