I have spoken to a number of LSU supporters and they have all told me the same thing, LSU should probably hire Billy Napier, but they won't. And this is all on Woodward. Woodward wants the splash hire and he will probably get it, but long term the better hire would be Napier, but it was never really an option to hire Napier unless the top 4 or 5 candidates said no.
Why not return to the model that brought us Napier. Look for an assistant that has spent years under Swinney and/or Saban. They know the most successful system in college football and the system Napier has put in place here for us. Obviously you have to correlate that with leadership style and not just the experience but not sure why that sort of model wouldn't be the first take.
Yea, but that's not what Brister said. Or has been saying all along. He's putting it on Woodward, when in reality, it wasn't just Woodward. It was everyone involved.
And the other thing is, Billy's camp knew it all along. He was posturing with the "interest" in LSU, which is what I tried to hint at earlier in the process. He has a great agent, who undoubtedly leveraged 3-4 different jobs to nail down Scott Strickland.
Just admit the truth. You didn't know bupkus & you were hiding in your little closet pretending to be someone special by ____ing on everyone else's take & acting like Napier wasn't going anywhere until this weekend when the heat got so hot on Billy's name you were gonna have to come up with some made up BS of your own.
Somebody making a big ole solid here . . .
There are currently 106 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 106 guests)