I'll never say never, but I think now a 12 is the only thing a mid major is going to get. I remember one year Gonzaga had a great season but got a 13. It wasn't until they did it consistently that their seeding got the benefit of the doubt.
However, you do have to schedule well even to get that 13 seed. None of our league teams do that.
SF Austin got a 9 seed after winning the SLC tournament and regular season championship at some point in the 21st century. A 9 seed is generally a at large bid. I’ve often wondered if they would have gotten that bid had they lost the final game in the SLC tournament. WKU got an at large bid when Marty won the SBC title. Just an couple of times that at large and fair seeding were involved.
These are all correct, but I think what you are missing is that the A5 conferences are continually making changes: RPI, Quadrant, NET, to limit the ability of at large bids going to non-A5 schools for March Madness.
Although the Cinderella stories DRIVE the March Madness bus, the A5 schools want more of that $$$$ slice of pie. For the foreseeable future, multiple bid non-A5 leagues, have been and will continue to trend down.
Okay,okay different days, different era. So I’m curious is the answer to double down with crappy opponents, hope to play great three days in March. Screw our fans. Then hell yeah just refurbish Blackham, add an outside corridor and pump in ac & heat put a bunch of chair backs. We good!!
Great Podcast Jay!
Keep em coming.
Jay, your conversation with Dr. Maggard was excellent. Thank you!
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)