well, coastal back up qb has talent too. They starting to kill Ga so.. Looks like they have their rhythm
Their wins are Fordham, Buffalo and Northwestern, look out Big 10. Look, Nebraska hasn’t been relevant since the 1990’s and I’m not arguing about them because frankly I give zero shirts. My point is style points is a stupid argument, but I guess the point you’re making is Nebraska sure has a lot of style points (close losses), but still a 3-6 record. Get those guys a ranking!
Now, if your point is that the Big 10 is highly over rated, especially the western division, then I couldn’t agree more. Any one of those crappy teams are a stud QB from challenging for their division.
Deal. I went and looked at their schedule and got back to you, like you asked me to.
Too many average P5 teams get the advantage of playing a “tough conference schedule” yet Cincy will be punished for not winning a conference game by 50. Style points has to be applied to all teams by the corrupt playoff committee. I’m only mad about (not mad at you) this because we could be in Cincy’s situation one day, I hope.
Like LSU and Clemson, Nebraska is 1 legit QB away from greatness.
Quality loses are now a thing. Tells you a lot about this system.
If you judge every team by the same criteria, close games against lesser teams should hurt everyone. Not the case if you’re in the P5. Cincy wins by a few and that’s penalized. P5 beats a 3 win team by a few, well that’s just a better conference.
Don’t waste one second trying to understand how the committee ranks teams.
There are no discernible standards they are following other than the bullshat “eye test”.
The so called CFP is nothing more than a small invitational tourney for snobby _____hats.
Fresno getting hammered
Tiggahs almost did it.
So does Bama get rewarded for a close loss?
There are currently 34 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 34 guests)