Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 166

Thread: Is USM a done deal?

  1. Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunFan3406 View Post
    You raise good points, but the CFP money is not static. It changes year to year based on the SBC's ranking amongst the G5. So while there is some validity to not adding more teams and reducing each teams individual payout, if you add teams that potentially increase your CFP payout by improving your overall ranking amongst the G5, then those teams are worth it.
    And will change again after the expansion of the playoff

  2. #50

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunFan3406 View Post
    You raise good points, but the CFP money is not static. It changes year to year based on the SBC's ranking amongst the G5. So while there is some validity to not adding more teams and reducing each teams individual payout, if you add teams that potentially increase your CFP payout by improving your overall ranking amongst the G5, then those teams are worth it.
    Right, but if you go back to that quote I posted, being at 10 teams was one of the keys to us getting that higher ranking. I don’t pretend to understand why it works out better with 10, but apparently it does.

  3. #51

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRebel View Post
    Right, but if you go back to that quote I posted, being at 10 teams was one of the keys to us getting that higher ranking. I don’t pretend to understand why it works out better with 10, but apparently it does.
    I get the money part about splitting but the main key to having higher rankings is our conference no longer gets totally skull f’d in OOC. Our champions went from finishing with losing records and barely bowl eligible to 2 teams ending ranked in the top 25 with combined 2 losses. If you have 9-10-12-14 teams it Doesn’t matter if you still only play 8 conference games. I think it could actually work out to have more teams with great records depending how the schedule falls

  4. #52

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    We are thinking of football. But think about the non-football sports. You play divisional games that require less travel and then a few games in cross-divisional matchups. So we could actually save money by having to go to 14 teams. Very similar to what happened to volleyball and basketball, but add in two more teams and games with divisional play. It will suck for a little bit, but I think this is the way to go.



  5. #54

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Can someone reach out to Tommy Mcclelland for a comment? Please, please, please! This is too good.


  6. #55

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    I really wish the SBC would have made a hard push for Rice.
    Rice and USM added to the west would have made for a really, really good baseball division.


  7. #56

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginDave View Post
    Southern Miss would automatically come in and be a really good rival in all sports. Granted our football paths have separated for some time now, but we had some great battles in the 80's and 90's with them.
    Never forget the Delhomme vs. Farve battle where Farve lead USM to a 7-6 victory in the last minutes of the 4th quarter. At least that’s what I remember.

  8. #57

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by Esqueleto View Post
    I really wish the SBC would have made a hard push for Rice.
    Rice and USM added to the west would have made for a really, really good baseball division.
    Bruh road trips to Houston, Hattiesburg, Mobile, and San Marcos. That's fiya. Oh well maybe they get tired of AAC and want in down the road

  9. #58

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by RCAJUN90 View Post
    Never forget the Delhomme vs. Farve battle where Farve lead USM to a 7-6 victory in the last minutes of the 4th quarter. At least that’s what I remember.
    Favre and Delhomme did not play at the same time. Brian Mitchell you mean?

  10. #59

    Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    I get the money part about splitting but the main key to having higher rankings is our conference no longer gets totally skull f’d in OOC. Our champions went from finishing with losing records and barely bowl eligible to 2 teams ending ranked in the top 25 with combined 2 losses. If you have 9-10-12-14 teams it Doesn’t matter if you still only play 8 conference games. I think it could actually work out to have more teams with great records depending how the schedule falls
    I can’t disagree with any of that. I’d be really curious to dig into what Benson specifically saw in that analysis.

  11. Default Re: Is USM a done deal?

    Quote Originally Posted by CharlieK View Post
    Favre and Delhomme did not play at the same time. Brian Mitchell you mean?
    They are 6 years apart in age.

Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Best Deal Around!!
    By NewsCopy in forum Up On LA
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 8th, 2004, 03:27 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •