Maybe he did mind calisthenics.
Before this thread I had never heard of anyone "not thinking" an interception or fumble negated the previous production of a drive.
Seriously I thought it was universally accepted that a fumble or interception negated all the hard work of the drive.
This take is new to me.
I guess some stats guru could do an analysis, but my guess is, if it were done the st.dev. would be so large, it would be meaningless. How much does a 40 yd interception thrown on third and long hurt you as opposed to throwing an interception on your opponents one yd line on first down?
I agree to a point. I will use a sales analogy. A sales person has a quota, he is meeting the quota or exceeding by a bit, but everyone in the world knows that there is a lot more revenue opportunity in the territory, IF the sales person executed better. In my experience at three Fortune 250 companies in sales, is that particular sales person will not be reassigned or fired, unless his manager is absolutely sure whoever replaces him will do better.
What I know everyone will have an opinion on is what is LL's quota in starting QB terms. I don't have a good answer for that. But I do know the answer of what Napier's quota is and that is winning games.
It is interesting that almost each and every analysis provided with respect to Levi results in a conclusion that he should unequivocally be the starting QB for Louisiana. So it is not a coincidence that the Head Coach feels the same way.
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)